2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/9353294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Approximate Method for Lightning-Radiated ELF/VLF Ground Wave Propagation over Intermediate Ranges

Abstract: A new approximate method for lightning-radiated extremely low-frequency (ELF) and very low-frequency (VLF) ground wave propagation over intermediate ranges is presented in this paper. In our approximate method, the original field attenuation function is divided into two factors in frequency domain representing the propagation effect of the ground conductivity and Earth's curvature, and both of them have clearer formulations and can more easily be calculated rather than solving a complex differential equation r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FDTD (finite difference time domain method) computed result is an E-field signal 2200 km away from the assumed lightning position. The model settings of FDTD were consistent with Hou's paper [21]. Figure 7 shows the formal FDTD computed result and that with added white noise for decomposition.…”
Section: Results Of Fdtd Computing Lightning Signal With White Noisesupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The FDTD (finite difference time domain method) computed result is an E-field signal 2200 km away from the assumed lightning position. The model settings of FDTD were consistent with Hou's paper [21]. Figure 7 shows the formal FDTD computed result and that with added white noise for decomposition.…”
Section: Results Of Fdtd Computing Lightning Signal With White Noisesupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Figure 3 shows the ionospheric electron density profiles used in the FDTD model during the daytime and nighttime. Other model settings are consistent with that of Hou et al's paper [37,38]. However, it is enough to accurately identify the ground wave peak point of the measured data by using a waveform bank without considering the geomagnetic field, and we are only interested in the character of the waveform bank, but not the value peak.…”
Section: Sferic Waveform Bankmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…It is worth noting that we have not established a simulated waveform bank of intracloud lightning (IC), because it is difficult to observe the multistation synchronization data of the IC owing to the propagation effect for a ground-based long-range lightning location network. Other model settings are consistent with that of Hou et al's paper [37,38]. However, it is enough to accurately identify the ground wave peak point of the measured data by using a waveform bank without considering the geomagnetic field, and we are only interested in the character of the waveform bank, but not the value peak.…”
Section: Sferic Waveform Bankmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…For long‐distance propagation of sferics from lightning, the time delay of the ground wave peak is related to the propagation distance (e.g., Honma et al., 1998; Pessi et al., 2009; Shao & Jacobson, 2009; Zhou et al., 2021). Besides the ground conductivity, the Earth curvature is also an important factor that causes larger ground wave attenuation over long distances (Hou et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%