2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2008.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach towards anomalous fading correction for feldspar IRSL dating — tests on samples in field saturation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
204
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
204
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown that the natural signal has a different anomalous fading rate from the laboratory irradiated samples Kars et al, 2008). In an extreme case, for a fieldsaturated sample, the signals generated by laboratory beta irradiation above the natural dose are dominated by the fading (geologically unstable) signals, while the natural signal are dominated by the non-fading (stable) signal .…”
Section: Effects Of Ir Bleaching On Tl Signal From N+ β Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that the natural signal has a different anomalous fading rate from the laboratory irradiated samples Kars et al, 2008). In an extreme case, for a fieldsaturated sample, the signals generated by laboratory beta irradiation above the natural dose are dominated by the fading (geologically unstable) signals, while the natural signal are dominated by the non-fading (stable) signal .…”
Section: Effects Of Ir Bleaching On Tl Signal From N+ β Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim was to compare fading data obtained in both laboratories using similar samples in order to evaluate whether the fading recorded was similar according to the stimulation source and/or the mineralogical fraction used. The samples were bleached (100 s at 280 C), given a 10 Gy dose and measured after storage periods ranging from 200 s to 73 h (Kars et al, 2008). The IRSL was recorded at 75 C, for 100 s, following a preheat at 220 C (10 s hold).…”
Section: Fading Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, Reimann et al (2015) showed that different pIRIR stimulation temperatures have different rates of bleaching under daylight exposure. In bleaching experiments conducted by these previous studies, the pIRIR signal intensity did not reach an unbleachable residual (Huntley, 2006) Kars et al (2008) and Kars and Wallinga (2009 level. However, Yi et al (2016) recently showed that the residual dose of the pIRIR 50/290 signal reached a lower limit after artificial sunlight (SOL2) bleaching for 300 h, and its residual dose was 6.2 ± 0.7 Gy.…”
Section: Residual Dose Estimationmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…4b). The data were also used to calculate the dimensionless recombination center density ρ' (Huntley, 2006), summarized in Table 3 for the fading correction following Kars et al (2008).…”
Section: Anomalous Fading Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%