A New Approach to Understanding Contemporary Jewish Engagement

Abstract

Although researchers have long recognized the multidimensional nature of Jewish life (e.g., Hartman in Studies in Contemporary Jewry, Oxford University Press, New York, 2014; Himmelfarb in Understanding American Jewry, Brandeis University, Waltham, 1982), most sociodemographic studies examine Jewish behaviors and attitudes in isolation rather than considering their complex interactions. Examining each of these behaviors and dimensions separately provides only limited understanding of the meaning and enactment of Jewish identity. The present study presents a statistical method to understand the patterns of Jewish engagement across multiple dimensions. Based on data from a survey of the Greater Boston Jewish community, latent class analysis was used to combine 14 behavioral measures into a typology of Jewish engagement. The results were a "partially ordered" set of 5 classes representing distinct behavior patterns. Three of the classes followed a low-to-high continuum. Two classes did not follow this order and represented distinct but parallel patterns of engagement. Most notably, the study identified a category of Cultural Jews who do not regularly practice Jewish rituals or affiliate with synagogues but do feel strong connections to the Jewish community. A simple continuum of Jewish identity disguises the multidimensional nature of engagement and provides too simplistic a tool for policymakers. This approach suggests not only a new method of measuring Jewish engagement, but, more importantly, a new way to understand contemporary Jewish identity.

According to their Numbers: Assessing the Pew Research Center’s Estimate of 7.5 Million Jewish Americans

“…Were one to accept DellaPergola's exclusion of children of intermarriage who do not identify religiously, American Jewry would appear as highly religious and Jewishly engaged, while excluding a large number people who identify as Jews and participate in Jewish home and community life. That narrative is at odds with how most Jewish communities view their constituents and the diversity of engagement with Jewish life (Aronson et al 2019).…”

Understanding perceptions of contemporary antisemitism among Orthodox Jews in London

“…However, only 4% of the respondents belong to a synagogue (this being one of the main prerequisites of being considered to be 'Orthodox') and yet 16% of the sample described themselves as 'Orthodox' despite the lack of synagogue membership (JPR, 2014, p.10). This discrepancy between synagogue membership and self-description, between the way people describe themselves and the way they behave, is noted in various US Jewish community studies (Aronson et al, 2015(Aronson et al, , 2019. Studies revealed that some Jews would describe themselves as affiliated Jews, who attend synagogues, but do not feel strong emotional ties to the Jewish world.…”

Lonely in Lockdown: Predictors of Emotional and Mental Health Difficulties Among Jewish Young Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…American Jews, concentrated in Northeast urban areas (Saxe et al 2021 ), were in a particularly vulnerable position to be affected in the pandemic’s early spread. Aside from the direct effects of the virus and the economic impact of efforts to curb its spread, widespread social distancing enacted to control the spread of the virus had troubling implications for the American Jewish population, given the importance of the Jewish community’s social and communal dimensions (Aronson et al 2019 ; Hartman and Sheskin 2012 ).…”