1972
DOI: 10.1007/bf00708615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach to the theory of relativity. III. Problem of the ether

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pol., 27,10,1996), it is clear that Winterberg has no embarrassment in recovering the old theories of the ether in a new context. Already L. Janossy had shown that if an ether exists, it is undetectable and, therefore, relativistic, which can also be said of the Planck scale [59,60]. In other words, for the purposes of mathematical construction, the basic ontological elusibility is not important, as we have already seen in the case of 't Hooft and other highly speculative approaches of contemporary physics, where sometimes even the boundaries between geometry and physics fade [61].…”
Section: Winterberg's Planck Plasma: An Exactly Non-relativistic Theorymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Pol., 27,10,1996), it is clear that Winterberg has no embarrassment in recovering the old theories of the ether in a new context. Already L. Janossy had shown that if an ether exists, it is undetectable and, therefore, relativistic, which can also be said of the Planck scale [59,60]. In other words, for the purposes of mathematical construction, the basic ontological elusibility is not important, as we have already seen in the case of 't Hooft and other highly speculative approaches of contemporary physics, where sometimes even the boundaries between geometry and physics fade [61].…”
Section: Winterberg's Planck Plasma: An Exactly Non-relativistic Theorymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Indeed Einstein's ideas on the question were reactivated by Janossy (1972) who considered the cosmological term AgPv in as a representation of the energy momentum tensor distribution of the background gravitational aether. Moreover, the introduction of a random g," component (which goes back to March 1934,1937, Markov 1958, Yukawa 1966and Blokhintsev 1974 has been recently revived by Frederick (1976), Namsrai (1980) and Cerofolini (1980) by the following conditions.…”
Section: Einstein's Subquantum Random Aether Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%