1969
DOI: 10.1002/cpt1969102250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach to the use of histamine skin tests in the study of antihistamine drugs

Abstract: . It is as active as chlorpheniramine and about 40 times as potent as diphenhydramine in protecting guinea pigs against lethal doses of histamine. At intravenous doses of 10 mg. per kilogram, it had no effect on electroencephalogram measurements in cats and was not sedative. Ro 5-9110/1 has a low toxicity in various species: Rats given 200 mg. per kilogram and dogs given 40 mg. per kilogram for 13 weeks as dietary admixture showed no toxic manifestations. Sedation also was not observed in these species."' The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the initial work (Bain et al, 1948) the wheal areas were measured either by transcribing the wheals onto tracing paper and computing them directly, or by calculating the areas using the mean radius of each wheal; the radius has been obtained from the average of the two diameters measured at right angles to each other for each wheal (Joubert et al, 1969). In a more recent study (Sullivan, 1982) cross diameters of each wheal were measured and from their averages the wheal area calculated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the initial work (Bain et al, 1948) the wheal areas were measured either by transcribing the wheals onto tracing paper and computing them directly, or by calculating the areas using the mean radius of each wheal; the radius has been obtained from the average of the two diameters measured at right angles to each other for each wheal (Joubert et al, 1969). In a more recent study (Sullivan, 1982) cross diameters of each wheal were measured and from their averages the wheal area calculated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%