1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00145-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach to the study of ocular chromatic aberrations

Abstract: We measured the ocular wavefront aberration at six different visible wavelengths (between 450 and 650 nm) in three subjects, using a spatially resolved refractometer. In this technique, the angular deviation of light rays entering the pupil at different locations is measured with respect to a target viewed through a centered pupil. Fits of the data at each wavelength to Zernike polynomials were used to estimate the change of defocus with wavelength (longitudinal chromatic aberration, LCA) and the wavelength-de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
114
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
9
114
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…12 In 1999, Marcos et al employed a spatially resolved refractometer to measure the LCA objectively in the visible range. The average LCA between 450 nm and 650 nm was 1.26 D. 13 In their study, unlike in most of the previous approaches based on subjective refraction, LCA was directly objectively estimated. LCA measurements gradually developed from using subjective methods to objective methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12 In 1999, Marcos et al employed a spatially resolved refractometer to measure the LCA objectively in the visible range. The average LCA between 450 nm and 650 nm was 1.26 D. 13 In their study, unlike in most of the previous approaches based on subjective refraction, LCA was directly objectively estimated. LCA measurements gradually developed from using subjective methods to objective methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In 1999, Marcos et al used a spatially resolved refractometer to measure the di®erence between two alignments, which corresponded to TCAs in di®er-ent time moments; this method had a lower precision in the estimation of the foveal TCA (0.52-1.84 arcmin) between 473 nm and 601 nm. 13 The in°uence of the eye movements, in particular that of microsaccades, 26 was signi¯cant in the TCA measurement. In this method, each measurement had to be realigned to the reference, which was the main cause of the low precision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that the eye's SA should be independent on the visible wavelength especially in a small pupil size, 20 the chromatic SA is assumed to be small. However, longitudinal chromatic defocus, although possibly reducible by proper materials of the IOL, 21 can systematically degrade the image quality at both foci of a DIOL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…85 LCA shows low intersubject variability and good agreement between model predictions and experimental data. 7,8 On the contrary, TCA varies among subjects 86,87 and is hardly predicted by rotationally symmetric eye models.…”
Section: Chromatic Aberrationmentioning
confidence: 92%