2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach to the tradeoff between quality and accessibility of health care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, living in a zip code with a higher percentage of highly-educated adults was associated with higher functional wellbeing, ovarian-specific, and TOI HRQOL scores in the bivariate analyses, but these coefficients lost statistical significance after controlling for other variables. These results confirm previous research demonstrating associations between ovarian cancer outcomes (including HRQOL) and contextual factors [8,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Alternative measures of community characteristics, including better measures of area-level SES, could reveal more robust associations with HRQOL [26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, living in a zip code with a higher percentage of highly-educated adults was associated with higher functional wellbeing, ovarian-specific, and TOI HRQOL scores in the bivariate analyses, but these coefficients lost statistical significance after controlling for other variables. These results confirm previous research demonstrating associations between ovarian cancer outcomes (including HRQOL) and contextual factors [8,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Alternative measures of community characteristics, including better measures of area-level SES, could reveal more robust associations with HRQOL [26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Availability of transportation, for example, has been investigated as a contributor to cancer disparities [14,15]. Cancer patients with higher travel burdens (in terms of distance and time) to their treatment centers often have poorer HRQOL, lower rates of adherence to treatment regimens, and worse survival outcomes [13,[15][16][17]. Variation in travel burden can pose challenges to cancer patients across the rural-urban continuum, though burdens may be offset by higher quality care at regionalized cancer centers (usually in urban areas) [15,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This demonstrates that social context must be also considered in the analysis of spatial inequalities in health. • Spatial accessibility to health care: Studies demonstrated a lower health care use in lower medical density areas [20] and for remote patients [21]. Health care access may improve prevention and early diagnosis of diseases but also follow-up and management [22].…”
Section: Combined Effects Of Local Health Care Accessibility Environmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In its informal opinion, the ACM assumed that patients were willing to travel further for better care for complex procedures. This argument is partly supported by the relevant academic literature: it has been shown that some patients are more inclined to travel further for higher quality of care, to a certain extent at least (Tanke and Ikkersheim, 2012;Ikkersheim et al, 2013;Gutacker et al, 2016;Middelveldt et al, 2018;Vallejo-Torres et al, 2018).…”
Section: B Potential Travel Time Effectsmentioning
confidence: 94%