2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.02.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach to producing transparent ZnAl 2 O 4 ceramics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[10][11][12] Fully dense ZnAl 2 O 4 ceramics have been reported in the literature, however, the grain sizes were relatively large. For example, Belyaeva et al 13 fabricated ZnAl 2 O 4 ceramics with an average grain size of 33 μm by using hot pressing and using ZnF 2 as a sintering aid. The samples were highly transparent, with light transmittance measured at 63% with a 550 nm wavelength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12] Fully dense ZnAl 2 O 4 ceramics have been reported in the literature, however, the grain sizes were relatively large. For example, Belyaeva et al 13 fabricated ZnAl 2 O 4 ceramics with an average grain size of 33 μm by using hot pressing and using ZnF 2 as a sintering aid. The samples were highly transparent, with light transmittance measured at 63% with a 550 nm wavelength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The valence band maximum (VBM) and conduction band minimum (CBM) for ZnAl 2 O 4 are located at the Γ point; therefore, the calculated direct band‐gap is 6.19 eV (Figure 4a). This value is only 0.14 eV (2.3%) greater than the experimental value (6.05 eV), [ 103 ] whereas ZnGa 2 O 4 and ZnIn 2 O 4 have an indirect ( L‐Γ ) band‐gap of 4.68 and 3.61 eV, respectively (see Figure 4B,C). The experimental band‐gap for ZnGa 2 O 4 is about 4.62 eV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…[ 68 ] Furthermore, a DFT/LDA calculation for the ZnAl 2 O 4 normal spinel was reported with a Γ‐Γ direct band‐gap of 4.25 eV. These results underestimate the experimental band‐gap energy by 36.03% for ZnAl 2 O 4 (experimental band‐gap 6.05 eV [ 103 ] ) and 48.26% for ZnGa 2 O 4 (experimental bang‐gap 4.62 eV [ 5 ] ). However, for the ZnGa 2 O 4 and ZnIn 2 O 4 materials simulated by the DFT/LDA approach, the band‐gap results were cited as indirect band‐gaps at Γ‐ K direction with 2.82 and 1.71 eV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35][36][37][38] However, most transparent oxide ceramics are generally prepared from raw nanopowders or/and cubic crystalline powders through different sintering techniques (vacuum sintering, spark plasma sintering, hot uniaxial sintering). [34,39,40] Numerous studies report transparent spinel ceramics such as MgAl 2 O 4 [33,41,42] or ZnAl 2 O 4 [43][44][45][46][47][48] while the zinc gallate spinel has not been yet achieved as a transparent ceramic. Indeed, the difference of evaporation speed of ZnO and Ga 2 O 3 (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%