2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach to mercury speciation in solids using a thermal desorption technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is generally considered that mercury can be presented in coal as sulfide and selenides, in forms associated with pyrite and marcasite (Ward et al 1999;Hower et al 2008;Kolker 2012), calcite and chlorite (Zhang et al 2002), selenio-galena (Dai et al 2006b(Dai et al , 2015, clausthalite (Hower and Robertson 2003), kleinite and cinnabar (Brownfield et al 2005), sphalerite (HgFeS 2 ) and getchellite (Dai et al 2006a). It can also organically bounded to organic matter (HgOM) (Rumayor et al 2015), or even as HgS and metallic mercury (Hg 0 ) (Finkelman 1994;Yudovich and Ketris 2005). It is clear that mercury is mostly associated with pyrite, especially late-stage (epigenetic) pyrite deposited from hydrothermal basinal fluids (Hower et al 2007;Diehl et al 2012;Kolker 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally considered that mercury can be presented in coal as sulfide and selenides, in forms associated with pyrite and marcasite (Ward et al 1999;Hower et al 2008;Kolker 2012), calcite and chlorite (Zhang et al 2002), selenio-galena (Dai et al 2006b(Dai et al , 2015, clausthalite (Hower and Robertson 2003), kleinite and cinnabar (Brownfield et al 2005), sphalerite (HgFeS 2 ) and getchellite (Dai et al 2006a). It can also organically bounded to organic matter (HgOM) (Rumayor et al 2015), or even as HgS and metallic mercury (Hg 0 ) (Finkelman 1994;Yudovich and Ketris 2005). It is clear that mercury is mostly associated with pyrite, especially late-stage (epigenetic) pyrite deposited from hydrothermal basinal fluids (Hower et al 2007;Diehl et al 2012;Kolker 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second reaction corresponding to the temperature range from 436.15 K to 694.15 K, is the thermal desorption of Hg and HgCl 2 , and the mass loss is 13%. According to the former researches [30][31][32][33], the desorption temperature range of the mercury and mercury compounds is from 323.15 K to 613.15 K, while this temperature range is lower than that in this work, and the reaction temperature difference might be caused by different sample compositions and structures. In this work, the matrix of the spent catalysts is activated carbon.…”
Section: Pressure Difference Approximate Calculationmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Lopez‐Anton and Rumayor et al obtained the pyrolysis spectrum of pure mercury compounds using TPD . The decomposition signal of black HgS (metacinnabar) is mainly distributed at 170°C to 290°C, and a characteristic peak appears at 245°C ± 15°C; red HgS (cinnabar) has a decomposition range of 240°C to 350°C, and the mercury signal peak is at 310°C ± 15°C with a shoulder at approximately 340°C; HgO presents a peak at approximately 505°C, and the peak range is 430°C to 560°C; the mercury release signal of HgSO 4 occurs primarily in the range of 500°C to 600°C with a clearly defined peak at 540°C ± 15°C; the peak of organic mercury (Hg‐OM) is approximately 217°C, and the thermal decomposition range is about 150°C to 290°C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lopez-Anton and Rumayor et al obtained the pyrolysis spectrum of pure mercury compounds using TPD. 25,26 The decomposition signal of black HgS (metacinnabar) is mainly distributed at 170°C to 290°C, and a characteristic peak appears at 245°C ± 15°C; red HgS (cinnabar) has a decomposition range of 240°C to 350°C, and the mercury signal peak is at 310°C ± 15°C with a shoulder at approximately 340°C;…”
Section: Pyrite Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%