1997
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9574.00038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach to maximum likelihood estimation of sum‐constrained linear models in case of undersized samples

Abstract: Maximum likelihood procedures for estimating sum-constrained models like demand systems, brand choice models and so on, break down or produce very unstable estimates when the number of categories (n) is large as compared with the number of observations (T ). In applied research, this problem is usually resolved by postulating the contemporaneous covariance matrix of the dependent variables to be known apart from a constant of proportionality. In this paper we develop a maximum likelihood procedure for sum-cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To that end we shall use a restricted speci® cation which has been introduced by de Boer and Harkema (1997). Letting diag fzg denote a diagonal matrix with the vector z on the main diagonal , the speci® cation reads as follows:…”
Section: Speci® Cation Of the Covariance Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To that end we shall use a restricted speci® cation which has been introduced by de Boer and Harkema (1997). Letting diag fzg denote a diagonal matrix with the vector z on the main diagonal , the speci® cation reads as follows:…”
Section: Speci® Cation Of the Covariance Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This property may successfully be used to devise an iterative procedure for the computation of the ML estimators. As regards the elements of the covariance matrix å n , de Boer and Harkema (1997) have shown that the ML estimatorsd i for the parameters d i …iˆ1;. .…”
Section: T He Estimation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation