1992
DOI: 10.1080/00036819208840084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach to grid generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
84
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The significance of this work stems from the fact that the existence proofs in [49] are constructive in nature, thus motivating associated numerical methods such as [86,88,89], discussed below. Specifically, Dacorogna and Moser linearize (3.11) by expanding φ as a perturbation from the identity: φ(x) = x+ν(x).…”
Section: The Deformation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The significance of this work stems from the fact that the existence proofs in [49] are constructive in nature, thus motivating associated numerical methods such as [86,88,89], discussed below. Specifically, Dacorogna and Moser linearize (3.11) by expanding φ as a perturbation from the identity: φ(x) = x+ν(x).…”
Section: The Deformation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated above, these concepts from [49] have been used to develop an algorithm for mesh transformation by Liao and co-workers [86,88,89], who noted that f (x) could be chosen to provide a transformation which contracts elements where f is small and expands them where it is large, forming the basis of an adaptive meshing algorithm. Liao and Su [90] then extended the ideas to allow for the tracking of time-varying volume elements.…”
Section: The Deformation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple and straightforward approach for determining the mesh transformation x(ξ, t) is to specify its Jacobian J (the determinant of (∂x)/(∂ξ)). This idea for mesh adaption has been used by many researchers, e.g., see [3,6,16,17,18]. While specifying the Jacobian is appealing in a number of aspects, the differential equations obtained directly are not necessarily easy to solve, nor is mesh nonsingularity guaranteed [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is not always clear how a mesh which drifts away from the desired one will be corrected at a later time for such methods, numerical results clearly demonstrate that they can be quite successful. Examples of methods in this class include the moving finite element (MFE) method of Miller and Miller [21,22], the deformation map method advocated by Liao and Anderson [18] and Semper and Liao [23], and the arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) method first proposed by Hirt, Amsden, and Cook for the solution of fluid dynamic problems [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main ways to follow in order to obtain adaptive meshes are: 1) mesh regenerating, 2) moving the inner nodes, 3) adding or extracting a number of nodes, 4) a composed method and taking into account the previous 3 methods already presented. The author suggest the reader to consider references [1], [2] for the case 1), [5], [8], [9] for the case 2), [3], [4], [7] for the case 3), [6] for the case 4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%