2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach to evaluate spatiotemporal dynamics of controlling parameters in distributed environmental models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous comprehensive sensitivity analysis we demonstrated that the controlling parameters exhibit varying sensitivity for different hydrodynamic conditions and for different spatially-distributed model outlets (Chen et al, 2017). Based on this information, we designed four steps to calibrate the model using different hydrodynamic system conditions and the observed time series for different outlets.…”
Section: Calibration Strategy 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a previous comprehensive sensitivity analysis we demonstrated that the controlling parameters exhibit varying sensitivity for different hydrodynamic conditions and for different spatially-distributed model outlets (Chen et al, 2017). Based on this information, we designed four steps to calibrate the model using different hydrodynamic system conditions and the observed time series for different outlets.…”
Section: Calibration Strategy 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 15 simultaneous minimization of the sum of the squared errors (SSE) of multiple observed time series was applied to constrain the model parameter space (described in section 3.4.2), which was defined based on our previous experience in the study region (Chen and Goldscheider, 2014;Chen et al, 2017). The DREAM algorithm allows an initial population of parameter sets to converge to a stationary sample.…”
Section: Model Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the widespread application and advancement of physically based, fully distributed (cell-by-cell basis) models, one of the foremost challenges in distributed model application continues to be parameter estimation (Beven and Binley, 1992;Gupta et al, 1998;Wagener and Gupta, 2005;Beven, 2006;Gharari et al, 2014;Chen et al, 2017). Model simulations and predictions require specification of parameter set(s) or ranges; selecting these set(s) and appropriate ranges is especially challenging given that fully distributed models, where inputs such as soil or vegetation are distributed across the watershed, require a larger number of model parameters (∼ 50-100 or more) and longer model run times than conceptual or lumped models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional sensitivity analysis has been widely used to show this relationship of karst spring discharge with different hydrological processes in a local karst catchment (Chang et al, 2017). Chen et al (2017) and Hartmann et al (2015) applied Sobol's global sensitivity method to evaluate parameters using different objective functions under different hydrodynamic conditions. However, very few studies have addressed the parameters' sensitivities for modeling seawater intrusion in a coastal karst aquifer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%