2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach to enhance the stiffness of heavy-load parallel robots by means of the component selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under this scenario, the parallel robot can be regarded as a parallel robot with six generalized driving elements in the force analysis. 7 This means that any slight vibration on the mobile platform of the DPR occurs in the DOF directions and other constrained directions. Thus, for a DPR, two vibration systems can be obtained, where one has fewer DOFs and the other has six DOFs.…”
Section: Vibration Modelling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Under this scenario, the parallel robot can be regarded as a parallel robot with six generalized driving elements in the force analysis. 7 This means that any slight vibration on the mobile platform of the DPR occurs in the DOF directions and other constrained directions. Thus, for a DPR, two vibration systems can be obtained, where one has fewer DOFs and the other has six DOFs.…”
Section: Vibration Modelling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the range of values for the joint clearances and the range of values for the stiffness of all branches are calculated based on equation (2), where the joint clearances and the stiffness of all component is given in our previous studies. 7 Natural frequencies. As commonly used physical parameters, the natural frequencies reflect the inherent vibration characteristics of the system.…”
Section: Numerical Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with GA, PSO has the advantages of simple principle, few parameters, fast convergence and good memory. 26 Pu et al applied the DE algorithm to the optimization of a 6-PSS PM motion simulation, which result showed that DE algorithm is better than the GA in providing optimal solution by about 48.3%, about 9.3% in terms of time-consuming. 27 Although DE algorithm has many advantages, it is seldom used in stiffness optimization of PMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To meet the demand for high precision from the industry, the stiffness analysis of PMs is also essential in the pre-design stage, which should consider the influences of joints and links, and is also the basis of the multi-objective optimization and structural design of PMs [17,18]. Considering the influence and importance of stiffness on the precision of PMs, many progresses have been presented by the academic community for the stiffness characteristics of PMs, which are focused on the various methods of the stiffness modeling and performance evaluation index [19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%