2020
DOI: 10.1029/2020gl088976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Approach to Constructing Models of Electron Diffusion by EMIC Waves in the Radiation Belts

Abstract: Electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves play an important role in relativistic electron losses in the radiation belts through diffusion via resonant wave-particle interactions. We present a new approach for calculating bounce and drift-averaged EMIC electron diffusion coefficients. We calculate bounce-averaged diffusion coefficients, using quasi-linear theory, for each individual Combined Release and Radiation Effects Satellite (CRRES) EMIC wave observation using fitted wave properties, the plasma density a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
56
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Diffusion coefficient models could then be constructed using appropriate averages of these individual diffusion coefficients, or stochastic methods such as suggested here. Preliminary studies of these new methods of averaging suggest that they are more effective than previous methods (Ross et al., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diffusion coefficient models could then be constructed using appropriate averages of these individual diffusion coefficients, or stochastic methods such as suggested here. Preliminary studies of these new methods of averaging suggest that they are more effective than previous methods (Ross et al., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, when constructing averaged diffusion coefficients, the average should be obtained by combining multiple observation‐specific diffusion coefficients (see Ross et al., 2020; Watt et al., 2019) rather than constructing diffusion coefficients from separately averaged wave parameters and plasma parameters. The results presented in this paper help us to consider how to construct drift‐averages of diffusion coefficients from observations, once individual observation‐specific bounce‐averaged diffusion coefficients have been constructed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ni et al (2015) investigated the sensitivity of electron diffusion to EMIC wave normal angle and found that at L ≤ 5.5 the decay timescales were nearly independent of the wave normal angle model at E ≥ 2 MeV unless a very oblique wave is adopted over all latitudes. We performed calculations using the latitudinal varying wave normal angle model from Ni et al (2015) and found minimal difference in the diffusion coefficients in the domain of interest to the fixed wave normal angle model used by Kersten et al (2014) and Ross et al (2020). Therefore we assume that the waves have a Gaussian distribution in X, X = tan ψ, where ψ is the wave normal angle, centered on ψ = 0 with a width X w = tan 15°.…”
Section: Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have highlighted the importance of including the variability in plasma properties and wave spectra in radiation belt modeling, for EMIC waves (Ross et al, 2020) as well as whistler-mode waves (Watt et al, 2019(Watt et al, , 2021 and Ultra Low-Frequency wave (Thompson et al, 2020). Ross et al (2020) developed a new approach for calculating electron diffusion coefficients by averaging observation specific diffusion coefficients (each calculated using the wave spectra and plasma density of each individual EMIC wave observation), rather than averaging the wave spectra and density measurements before calculating diffusion coefficients (e.g., Kersten et al [2014]). This approach, applied to CRRES EMIC observations, significantly improved the agreement between global radiation belt models and Van Allen Probe observations of relativistic and ultra-relativistic electron flux compared to EMIC diffusion models using average wave spectra and plasma density.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%