A New Approach to AHP Decision-Making

Abstract

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. This content downloaded from 169.230.Abstract. Saaty's Analytic Hierarchical Process is one of the most commonly used methods of prioritizing the elemental issues in a complex problem. This paper goes some way towards overcoming some objections to the method and offers an explanation as to why the method is more suitable for simple prioritization rather than for the much more useful task of the quantification and weightings for the issues. It suggests a strategy for overcoming this limitation and, incidentally, indicates how the application of the method might be extended to cater for the case of judgements determined by consensus among a panel rather than by a single individual.

Implementation Strategy of Timber Legality Verification System (Svlk) in the Furniture Industry in Indonesia: Swot and Ahp Analysis.

“…AHP can also be used to select some alternative strategies available in the formulation of the strategy (Marimin, et al, 2010). The use of AHP in comparing two elements can be achieved in various ways but the most commonly used in comparing alternatives is the one that gives values in a scale of 1-9 giving the importance of an alternative in comparison to another ( Donegan, et al, 1991) as shown in table 1. According to Kurttila et al (2000) the combined SWOT with AHP methodology applied is in order to reach the aims of study in determining the best alternative.…”

Important Facts and Observations about Pairwise Comparisons (the special issue edition)

“…The Donegan-Dodd scale [5] was suggested to handle the most extreme judgments (λ = ±8 in our notation). It is based on the inverse hyperbolic tangent function:…”

IMP: A decision aid for multiattribute evaluation using imprecise weight estimates

“…The adoption of this lexicon leads to a method which may be seen as "essentially qualitative and not realistically quantitative" [49] and that such judgements "should be treated as qualitative information without associating any quantitative meaning" [50]. These verdicts may be a little harsh but do draw attention to the difficulty involved in language use in pursuit of constructing a "model that computes with words directly" [51], which seems an impossible goal.…”