2016
DOI: 10.1002/mawe.201600522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach for the determination of technological parameters for hydroabrasive cutting of materials

Abstract: A method for the design of a technology for the abrasive waterjet cutting of materials is based on the determination of the constant of cuttability of materials using an abrasive waterjet Kawj according to four different versions. Version A, where three deformation parameters are measured on the test cut/sample, namely selected depth hx [mm], local roughness Rax [μm] at depth hx and local deviation of the cut trace from the normal plane Yretx at depth hx. Version B, where merely two deformation parameters are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, optimization of the machining is the subject of many studies [4,14,21]. High pressure water is converted to a high speed jet inside a nozzle (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, optimization of the machining is the subject of many studies [4,14,21]. High pressure water is converted to a high speed jet inside a nozzle (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical pressure levels used by the abrasive water jet (AWJ) system range from 400 MPa to 600 MPa. The most commonly used abrasive is garnet [3] and [5].…”
Section: Obtaining the Selected Surface Roughness By Means Of Mathemamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated by Hashish [ 2 ], AWJ machining consists of shaping materials using a highly concentrated water jet doped with abrasive grains. The most commonly used abrasive is garnet [ 3 ]. In addition to numerous advantages, such as those mentioned by Krajcarz [ 4 ] (including no thermal distortion, high flexibility, high machining versatility, small machining force, and the absence of a heat-affected zone), this method has some limitations, as reported Wang et al [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%