A new approach for interexaminer reliability data analysis on dental caries calibration

Abstract

Objectivesa) to evaluate the interexaminer reliability in caries detection considering different diagnostic thresholds and b) to indicate, by using Kappa statistics, the best way of measuring interexaminer agreement during the calibration process in dental caries surveys.MethodsEleven dentists participated in the initial training, which was divided into theoretical discussions and practical activities, and calibration exercises, performed at baseline, 3 and 6 months after the initial training. For the examinations of 6-7-year-old schoolchildren, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations were followed and different diagnostic thresholds were used: WHO (decayed/missing/filled teeth – DMFT index) and WHO + IL (initial lesion) diagnostic thresholds. The interexaminer reliability was calculated by Kappa statistics, according to WHO and WHO+IL thresholds considering: a) the entire dentition; b) upper/lower jaws; c) sextants; d) each tooth individually.ResultsInterexaminer reliability was high for both diagnostic thresholds; nevertheless, it decreased in all calibration sections when considering teeth individually.ConclusionThe interexaminer reliability was possible during the period of 6 months, under both caries diagnosis thresholds. However, great disagreement was observed for posterior teeth, especially using the WHO+IL criteria. Analysis considering dental elements individually was the best way of detecting interexaminer disagreement during the calibration sections.

Influence of Tooth Loss and Unmet Treatment Needs on the Social Aspects of Quality of Life and Self-esteem in Adolescents

“…Inter-examiner agreement was confirmed during theoretical discussions when examiners showed photographic slides containing clinical examples of each parameter to be investigated in the study. During the discussions the examiners' knowledge was evaluated and they were instructed in the criteria and examination methods to be used so as to achieve an initial standardization [18].…”

Efficacy of sonic-powered toothbrushes for plaque removal in patients with peri-implant mucositis

“…After a brief training, two examiners (JWL, JEL) performed repeated measurements of the mPI and mSBI using clinical photographs one week apart. The intra-examiner reproducibility and inter-examiner reliability of the measurements of the mPI and mSBI were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Kappa statistics [ 19 , 20 ].…”

Clinical instruments and methods for assessing physical oral health: A systematic review

“…The most common epidemiologic index for caries prevalence is the Decayed, Missing and Filled (DMF) Index, which was first introduced in 1930 and later on recommended by the World Health Organization . While reliability is considered to be good, validity has often been questioned . Furthermore, the Periodontal Screening (and Recording) Index (PSI/PSR) is recommended by the American Dental Association and the American Academy of Periodontology as a simple and effective system to detect periodontal disease .…”

“…9 While reliability is considered to be good, validity has often been questioned. [10][11][12][13][14][15] Furthermore, the Periodontal Screening (and Recording) Index (PSI/PSR) is recommended by the American Dental Association and the American Academy of Periodontology as a simple and effective system to detect periodontal disease. 16 However, convincing evidence of its reliability and validity is lacking.…”