2014
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2014-14114-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach for analysis and evaluation of partial photoneutron reaction cross sections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the Brink hypothesis of the approximate equality of the upward and downward γ SF, one can construct the γ SF by combining (γ ,n), (γ ,γ ) and the Oslo data with the (γ ,n) cross section as absolute normalization. Figures 6 and 7 show thus constructed γ SF for 117 Sn [13] and 74 Ge [15].…”
Section: Constructing Experimental γ -Ray Strength Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the Brink hypothesis of the approximate equality of the upward and downward γ SF, one can construct the γ SF by combining (γ ,n), (γ ,γ ) and the Oslo data with the (γ ,n) cross section as absolute normalization. Figures 6 and 7 show thus constructed γ SF for 117 Sn [13] and 74 Ge [15].…”
Section: Constructing Experimental γ -Ray Strength Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the elaborate efforts of evaluating the Livermore and Saclay data of partial photonuetron cross sections, especially those based on the transitional neutron-multiplicity function [15] as well as (γ , n) cross sections below twoneutron separation energies compiled in the photonuclear data library [8], it turned out that the discrepancy between the Livermore and Saclay data cannot be resolved in any systematic way. In many cases of the partial cross sections, Saclay provided larger cross sections for (γ , n) reactions than Livermore and vice versa for (γ , 2n) reactions.…”
Section: Direct Neutron-multiplicity Sortingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. [12], squares [15], solid line [8], dots [14]); c-197 Au (triangles [17], squares [18], solid line [8], dots [9]). …”
Section: The Disagreements Between New Evaluated and Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [14] it was shown for 159 Tb that in the energy range between thresholds B 2n and B 3n integrated cross section σ eval-int (γ , 1n) is about 20% larger than the Livermore data [12] and about 20% smaller than the Saclay measurements [15], whereas σ eval-int (γ , 2n) is 15% larger than in [15] and 20% smaller as compared to those of [12]. Therefore the difference between evaluated and experimental [12,15] values of the important cross section ratio σ eval-int (γ , 2n)/σ eval-int (γ , 1n) is ∼ 30%.…”
Section: The Disagreements Between New Evaluated and Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation