1972
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.115.3.619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Application of Forensic Radiology: Identification of Deceased From a Single Clavicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This included coaching on thoracic anatomy, chest radiograph interpretation, and radiographic comparison methods. Because the other examiners (i.e., [3][4][5][6][7][8] received no in-depth pretest mentoring, they were categorized as being ''untrained.'' This categorization should not be interpreted to mean that these examiners had no understanding of the radiographic comparison principles (examiners were all drawn from disciplines where radiographic comparison is routine); no clinical radiography training; no experience or training undertaking radiographic comparisons; or no familiarity ⁄ training with the osseous structures of the chest-as some did (see Table 3 for details).…”
Section: Examinersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This included coaching on thoracic anatomy, chest radiograph interpretation, and radiographic comparison methods. Because the other examiners (i.e., [3][4][5][6][7][8] received no in-depth pretest mentoring, they were categorized as being ''untrained.'' This categorization should not be interpreted to mean that these examiners had no understanding of the radiographic comparison principles (examiners were all drawn from disciplines where radiographic comparison is routine); no clinical radiography training; no experience or training undertaking radiographic comparisons; or no familiarity ⁄ training with the osseous structures of the chest-as some did (see Table 3 for details).…”
Section: Examinersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite several published case reports that use comparisons of AM ⁄ PM chest radiographs to help identify disarticulated skeletons (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11), no large-scale controlled scientific studies have been pursued to systematically quantify method accuracies. Such studies are warranted so that methods with known errors can be applied in forensic casework (12,13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research follows numerous other radiographic studies that have analyzed the scapula, hyoid, hand, chest, frontal sinuses, vertebrae, clavicles, maxillary sinuses, ankle, and orthopedic surgical devices to identify human remains . While previous studies have tested the reliability of surgically implanted devices, these findings have focused on the type of device, such as hip implants and plates/screws related to fracture repair , or the manufacturer and lot number .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medical imaging has long been used for the identification of human remains and is well documented (Binda et al 1999;Buchner 1985;Craig 1995;Jensen 1991;Murphy et al 1980;Sanders et al 1972;Schwartz and Woolridge 1977). Radiology is used extensively in anthropological and odontological assessment of postmortem and antemortem radiographs, records, or other images for concordance because they represent an excellent source of data for comparison of anatomical features (Figures 5-2A and 5-2B).…”
Section: Positive Identification Of Individuals By Comparison Of Antementioning
confidence: 99%