1985
DOI: 10.1016/0196-9781(85)90075-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new antiserum with conformational specificity for LHRH: Usefulness for radioimmunoassay and immunocytochemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radioimmunoassay of GnRH was performed as described previously (Chappell and Levine, 2000) using the EL-14 GnRH antiserum (Ellinwood et al, 1985). The intra-assay and interassay coefficients of variance for the assays were 14.2 and 8.2%, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radioimmunoassay of GnRH was performed as described previously (Chappell and Levine, 2000) using the EL-14 GnRH antiserum (Ellinwood et al, 1985). The intra-assay and interassay coefficients of variance for the assays were 14.2 and 8.2%, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sections were washed with 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), and then processed with streptavidin-FITC as described previously [11]. After localizing the biocytin-filled neuron, the slides containing the appropriate sections were processed with either a monoclonal tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) antibody (Ink-Star, Stillwater, Minn., USA) at a 1:3,000 dilution, a GnRH antiserum [12] at a 1:2,500 dilution or a β-endorphin antiserum [13] at a 1:1,000 dilution, using fluorescence immunohistochemistry [11]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…hpg mice, obtained from Harry Charlton (Oxford University, England), were maintained in our animal facilities in temperature-and light-controlled (14 hr light/10 hr dark) rooms, with food and water available ad libitum. Female mice were 2-5 months old and males 4-5 (T and W nos., see (8,9). RM 8/5 (1:1000) is thought to identify a secondary cleavage product of the precursor molecule (10), whereas ARC II (1:2000) identifies the dibasic amino acid cleavage site (11).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%