2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-8741(00)00339-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new antibacterial compound from Ibicella lutea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The bactericidal activities of both ethyl acetate and methanol extracts on both Gram-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ACC) , a multidrug-resistant bacterium at a concentration of (0.100 ± 0.00) mg/mL, and Escherichia coli (ATCC 35150) , multidrug-resistant reference strains also at the same concentration of (0.100 ± 0.00) mg/mL of the plant under investigation, further establish the findings obtained in our previous study [25] that volatile oil from the leaves and flowers of C. citrinus is more effective against Gram-negative bacteria. The high fatty acid content as shown in Tables 1 and 2 of both methanol and ethyl acetate extracts might also contribute to the excellent antimicrobial activity recorded in this work because previous documentation by these researchers [7779] have attested to the fact that high fatty acid components might be responsible for the antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antiviral potentials of Pentanisia prunelloides and Helichrysum pedunculatum . In addition to this, the disparities seen in the antimicrobial properties of both ethyl acetate and methanol extracts might be due to discrepancy in the chemical constituents of the two extracts coupled with some bioactive compounds such as alkaloids, tannins, terpenoids, ether, and phenolic compounds like flavonoids, which are considered to be bacteriostatic and bactericidal as reported in our previous study [25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The bactericidal activities of both ethyl acetate and methanol extracts on both Gram-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ACC) , a multidrug-resistant bacterium at a concentration of (0.100 ± 0.00) mg/mL, and Escherichia coli (ATCC 35150) , multidrug-resistant reference strains also at the same concentration of (0.100 ± 0.00) mg/mL of the plant under investigation, further establish the findings obtained in our previous study [25] that volatile oil from the leaves and flowers of C. citrinus is more effective against Gram-negative bacteria. The high fatty acid content as shown in Tables 1 and 2 of both methanol and ethyl acetate extracts might also contribute to the excellent antimicrobial activity recorded in this work because previous documentation by these researchers [7779] have attested to the fact that high fatty acid components might be responsible for the antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antiviral potentials of Pentanisia prunelloides and Helichrysum pedunculatum . In addition to this, the disparities seen in the antimicrobial properties of both ethyl acetate and methanol extracts might be due to discrepancy in the chemical constituents of the two extracts coupled with some bioactive compounds such as alkaloids, tannins, terpenoids, ether, and phenolic compounds like flavonoids, which are considered to be bacteriostatic and bactericidal as reported in our previous study [25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…According to Cerdeiras et al [15] and Simirgiotis et al [38], the stearic acid glycoside and the 20 S, 24 R-epoxy-3a-acetoxy-1b, 12 b, 25-trihydroxydammarane were responsible for the antibacterial activity of the extract against a group of bacterial isolates.…”
Section: Concentration Of I Luteamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In an earlier study, the antimicrobial activity of the aqueous and ethanolic extracts of I. lutea was assessed and the aqueous extract showed activity against some Gram positive and negative pathogens determined by an agar-diffusion method [6]. Several extracts (H 2 O, EtOH:H 2 O 70:30, EtOH, CH 2 Cl 2 :MeOH 3:1, acetone and CHCl 3 ) of I. lutea aerial parts were tested for antibacterial activity and it was concluded that the most active was the chloroformic one [15]. According to these authors, the extract was active against Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A partir de l'extrait chloroformique d'Ibicella lutea, le composé antibactérien principal a été isolé et identifié par plusieurs méthodes MS et RMN en tant que nouveau composé (Cerdeiras et al, 2000). L'extrait de cette plante a eu un effet sur le taux de croissance bactérien et la morphologie bactérienne.…”
Section: Intérêt éConomiqueunclassified