2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new abundance estimate for Maui’s dolphin: What does it mean for managing this critically endangered species?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
71
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the areas linking North Island and South Island (Areas 4, 5 and 9) have relatively high levels of fishing effort and low dolphin numbers. Likewise, fishing impacts may explain the , 2006a. However, relative levels of fishing activity in different parts of this species' range also appear to have a strong influence on the distribution of Hector's dolphins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For example, the areas linking North Island and South Island (Areas 4, 5 and 9) have relatively high levels of fishing effort and low dolphin numbers. Likewise, fishing impacts may explain the , 2006a. However, relative levels of fishing activity in different parts of this species' range also appear to have a strong influence on the distribution of Hector's dolphins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A similar method of back-calculation is described in Smith & Polachek (1979), Barlow & Hanan (1995) and Martien et al (1999). The distribution for population size was based on the most recent population estimate for each area (see Slooten et al 2004Slooten et al , 2006a.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In aerial surveys of similar design, the furthest offshore sightings were 4 nautical miles off the North Island west coast, 6 nautical miles off the South Island west coast, and at least 15 nautical miles off Banks Peninsula (Rayment et al 2003;Slooten et al 2005Slooten et al , 2006. The common denominator appears to be water depth, with all sightings made in less than 90 m of water.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%