2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new ABC variant for solving inverse kinematics problem in 5 DOF robot arm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the SDE algorithm, it was considered to use the amplification factor F = 0.5 and crossover constant C R = 0.8 based on Fan, Xie & Zhou (2019). The particular parameter setting for KABC are the forager bees population P f = 20, the onlooker bees population P o = N − P f , and stagnation limit parameter L = (N * D)/2, see Karaboga & Basturk (2007) and El-Sherbiny, Elhosseini & Haikal (2018). With respect to the common parameter settings, it was considered to use a population size of N = 30 individuals, a total of G max = 1,000 generations, and a tolerance of s stop = 1 × 10 −4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the SDE algorithm, it was considered to use the amplification factor F = 0.5 and crossover constant C R = 0.8 based on Fan, Xie & Zhou (2019). The particular parameter setting for KABC are the forager bees population P f = 20, the onlooker bees population P o = N − P f , and stagnation limit parameter L = (N * D)/2, see Karaboga & Basturk (2007) and El-Sherbiny, Elhosseini & Haikal (2018). With respect to the common parameter settings, it was considered to use a population size of N = 30 individuals, a total of G max = 1,000 generations, and a tolerance of s stop = 1 × 10 −4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In El-Sherbiny, Elhosseini & Haikal (2018), a new variant of ABC is introduced to solve the inverse kinematics of robot manipulators, which is called KABC. The reported results prove that the KABC algorithm performed better than the classical ABC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performances of the proposed algorithm and that of the competitive algorithms are evaluated through two groups of benchmark functions; 18 scalable functions taken from [27] and 30 complex functions taken from CEC'2017 [50]. The definition of the functions in the first group and their global optima are listed in Table 1; f1 -f10 are the uni-modal functions, and f11 -f18 are the multi-modal functions.…”
Section: The Experiments and Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, various optimization algorithms such as genetic algorithm (GA) [6,7], particle swarm optimization algorithm (PSO) [8][9][10][11][12], differential evolution algorithm (DE) [2,13,14], artificial bee colony algorithm (ABC) [15], and biogeographybased optimization [16] have been proposed to calculate the inverse kinematics solutions of robots; thus the shortcomings of the conventional methods are effectively overcome. In this study, a fitness function was constructed to minimize the pose error of end-effector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%