SAE Technical Paper Series 1997
DOI: 10.4271/970921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New 2.3L DOHC Engine with Balance Shaft Housing - Steps of Refinement and Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, there are two types of balance shafts: the MMC type (Huegen et al, 1997), and the Lanchester type (Nakamura, 1976). The former reduces the unbalanced bounce force and moment while the latter controls only the bounce force.…”
Section: Inertial Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, there are two types of balance shafts: the MMC type (Huegen et al, 1997), and the Lanchester type (Nakamura, 1976). The former reduces the unbalanced bounce force and moment while the latter controls only the bounce force.…”
Section: Inertial Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oguchi Koji et al designed a silent crankshaft in the engine to reduce its second-order vibration and improve the NVH performance in cars [16]. St. Huege et al developed an in-line four-cylinder engine with a double balance shaft device, which greatly improved the NVH performance [17]. Shoji Adachi et al optimized the mass of reciprocating motion and valve train motion, greatly reducing the second-order inertial force [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the fundamental role of balance shaft module can be conducted by the rotating unbalance mass on balance shaft while a target engine is under operation, the prior interest should be focused on the design of balance shaft including a strategy on unbalance mass as well as supporting bearings. The response of rotor dynamics, shown as reaction forces on bearing or bending deformation, will be dependent on the condition of shape of balance shaft or the location of unbalance mass, even though the unbalances are fixed as certain value (Stone and Ball, 2004;Ishikawa et al, 2002;Suh et al, 2000;Meek and Roberts, 1998;Huegen et al, 1997). Recently, Kim et al (2012) proposed the optimal location of both a supporting bearing and a deflection of balance shaft by introducing the objective function to minimize interesting energy terms, both the elastic strain energy and the kinematic energy of a balance shaft (Kim et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%