1982
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3093(82)90189-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A neutron diffraction investigation of the structure of vitreous zinc chloride

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The figure also shows the analogous distribution obtained from the bulk glass at ambient pressure using PIM, which is similar to distributions observed in bulk silicates [30,31]. The bulk distribution is significantly broader than those generated for the bilayer with θ ∼ 145 • and ∆θ ∼ 36 • .…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…The figure also shows the analogous distribution obtained from the bulk glass at ambient pressure using PIM, which is similar to distributions observed in bulk silicates [30,31]. The bulk distribution is significantly broader than those generated for the bilayer with θ ∼ 145 • and ∆θ ∼ 36 • .…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…The highest temperature reached by the TMD falls from BeF2false⟶SiO2false⟶GeO2false⟶H2O. The inset to the figure shows the mean M–X–M bond angles, θ¯MXM, that is, the bond angles between neighbouring MX4 tetrahedra for the BeF2 model over the full range of polarizabilities studied along with experimental values for BeF2, SiO2 and GeO2 [77]. There is a clear correlation between the temperature scale at which the TMD locus emerges and the mean inter-tetrahedral bond angle, again as this bond angle is an effective measure of the energetic balance between local high and low density environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SiO2, GeO2 and BeF2 show structural similarities in the sense that the nearest-neighbour coordination polyhedra are MX4 tetrahedra. However, their ordering beyond the short-range may differ as the bridging bond angles between neighbouring tetrahedra vary from θ¯normalMXM130 for GeO2, to θ¯normalMXM145 for SiO2, to θ¯normalMXM155 for BeF2 [77]. The M–X–M bond angles are controlled by many-body (ion polarization) interactions [78,79].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, for the present glass, it should be noted that electron densities of GeO 2 and GeS 2 glasses are not very different (330 and 250 electrons/nm 3 ) because the atomic electron densities (8 and 16/atom) of O for S tend to counterbalance the macroscopic densities of GeO 2 and GeS 2 (3.7 and 2.7 g/cm 3 ). 9) Probably due to the first reason, meaningful images of GeO 2 could not be obtained. However, for GeS 2 and 50GeO 2 -50GeS 2 , we can obtain TEM images having a reproducible difference; i.e., a smooth image of GeS 2 and a contrast fluctuated one with a scale of $10 nm in 50GeO 2 -50GeS 2 .…”
Section: Temmentioning
confidence: 99%