2019
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201901037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Neutral Geminal Tin/Phosphorus Frustrated Lewis Pair

Abstract: The geminal frustrated Lewis pair (FLP) (F 5 C 2 ) 3 SnCH 2 P(tBu) 2 (2)w as prepared by reacting (F 5 C 2 ) 3 SnCl with LiCH 2 P(tBu) 2 .I ti sn eutral and contains an extremely electronegatively substituted, but relatively soft (hard-soft acid-base,H SAB) acidic tin function. Its FLPtype reactivity was proven by reaction with av ariety of small molecules (CO 2 ,S O 2 ,C S 2 ,P hNCO,H Cl, (Ph 3 P)AuCl). However,itshows no reaction in H/D scrambling experiments with H 2 /D 2 mixtures and binds CO 2 reversibly,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

9
80
0
8

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(49 reference statements)
9
80
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The S−O bond lengths in 2 between 1.604(5) and 1.615(4) Å are unusually long: more than 0.1 Å longer than in gaseous SO ( r e =1.481(1) Å, determined by high‐resolution IR spectroscopy), gaseous SO 2 ( r e =1.430793(4) Å determined by gas electron diffraction), and also longer than the endocyclic S−O bond in the corresponding adduct 1 ⋅SO 2 (1.524(1) Å) . The latter correlates with significantly shorter Sn−O (2.122(4)–2.131(4) Å) and P−S (2.082(2)–2.089(2) Å) bonds in 2 compared to 1 ⋅SO 2 at 2.239(1) and 2.331(1) Å, respectively …”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The S−O bond lengths in 2 between 1.604(5) and 1.615(4) Å are unusually long: more than 0.1 Å longer than in gaseous SO ( r e =1.481(1) Å, determined by high‐resolution IR spectroscopy), gaseous SO 2 ( r e =1.430793(4) Å determined by gas electron diffraction), and also longer than the endocyclic S−O bond in the corresponding adduct 1 ⋅SO 2 (1.524(1) Å) . The latter correlates with significantly shorter Sn−O (2.122(4)–2.131(4) Å) and P−S (2.082(2)–2.089(2) Å) bonds in 2 compared to 1 ⋅SO 2 at 2.239(1) and 2.331(1) Å, respectively …”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 76%
“…[8] Despite these activities in SO chemistry, the trapping of a complete S-O unit by a main group metal system has not been achieved so far, but occurred when we reacted our recently reported Sn/P FLP (F 5 C 2 ) 3 SnCH 2 P(tBu) 2 (1) with Nsulfinylaniline PhNSO. [9] FLP 1 is the heaviest congener of a series of tetrel-based FLP systems (F 5 C 2 ) 3 ECH 2 P(tBu) 2 (E = Si, Ge, Sn (1)), with large differences in their reactivity. [9,10] Due to its relatively soft Lewis acid binding site, the Sn/P FLP 1 is, for instance, capable of reversibly binding CO 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Trotz dieser Aktivitäten in der SO‐Chemie ist es bisher nicht gelungen, eine intakte S‐O‐Einheit durch ein Hauptgruppenmetallsystem einzufangen. Dies erreichten wir nun, als wir unser kürzlich vorgestelltes Sn/P‐FLP (F 5 C 2 ) 3 SnCH 2 P( t Bu) 2 ( 1 ) mit N ‐Sulfinylanilin, PhNSO, umsetzten . FLP 1 ist das schwerste Homologe einer Reihe Tetrel‐basierter FLP‐Systeme (F 5 C 2 ) 3 ECH 2 P( t Bu) 2 (E=Si, Ge, Sn ( 1 )), die große Differenzen in ihrer Reaktivität aufweisen .…”
Section: Figureunclassified
“…Aufgrund seiner relativ weichen Lewis‐Säurebindungsstelle ist das Sn/P‐FLP 1 z. B. in der Lage, CO 2 reversibel zu binden . Seine Affinität zu Sauerstoffatomen ist offensichtlich weniger ausgeprägt als in Systemen mit deutlich härteren Säurefunktionen wie solchen auf Bor‐, Aluminium‐ oder Silicium‐Basis.…”
Section: Figureunclassified