“…The descriptors used were: (ALL ("circular economy" ) AND ( "Measurement" ) AND ( "Sustainable Development" ) AND ( "Analytical Hierarchy Process" ) ) AND ( ( ( circular AND economy ) ) AND ( measurement ) ) AND ( sustainable ) AND ( LIMIT-TO ( PUBYEAR , 2022 ) OR LIMIT-TO ( PUBYEAR , 2021 ) OR LIMIT-TO ( PUBYEAR , 2020 ) OR LIMIT-TO ( PUB-YEAR , 2019 ) OR LIMIT-TO ( PUBYEAR , 2018 ) ) AND ( LIM-IT-TO ( DOCTYPE , "ar" ) ). The state-of-the-art review revealed 148 possible articles, 28 of which were good matches for the subject and were used for the CE discussions since they addressed some of the CE steps, such as, for example, reduce, reuse, and recycle (Kumar et al, 2021;, or focused on energy and carbon emissions (Mishra et al, 2021); solar energy (Erol et al, 2021), biomass (Facchini et al, 2021), and e-waste (Alblooshi et al, 2022). However, most of these publications refer to the need to identify barriers to CE implementation (Kumar et al, 2021;Ullah et al, 2021;Irfan et al, 2022).…”