1993
DOI: 10.1016/0968-090x(93)90002-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A neural network-based methodology for pavement crack detection and classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the possible classifiers can be listed as Bayes classifier [15], k-nearest neighborhood classifier [16], multilayer feed-forward artificial neural networks [17], support vector machines [18], and etc. However, in most of the recent studies performed for crack detection, where several classifiers are compared, the accuracy of the results obtained by using neural network classifiers is shown to be higher than the other listed methods ( [8]; [9]; [14]; [19]). Thus, for this research, the neural network classifier is selected to be used for classification.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some of the possible classifiers can be listed as Bayes classifier [15], k-nearest neighborhood classifier [16], multilayer feed-forward artificial neural networks [17], support vector machines [18], and etc. However, in most of the recent studies performed for crack detection, where several classifiers are compared, the accuracy of the results obtained by using neural network classifiers is shown to be higher than the other listed methods ( [8]; [9]; [14]; [19]). Thus, for this research, the neural network classifier is selected to be used for classification.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This prevents most of the current approaches from being used for crack quantification, since these methods are specifically developed for crack detection rather than quantification. For current approaches, it is required to maintain a constant focal length, resolution, or distance to the object in order to be able to extract crack dimensions ( [8]; [9]; rd International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2016) [10]; [11]; [12]; [13]). The damage detection method discussed in authors' previous research eliminates the requirement for prior knowledge on focal length, resolution, or distance to the investigated object, since all the required parameters for the defect detection are extracted from the point cloud automatically.…”
Section: Improvements For Crack and Spalling Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results contain less false detections but they are highly dependent on the choice of the parameters. Neuron networks-based methods have been proposed to alleviate the problems of the two first categories (Kaseko and Ritchie, 1993). However, they need a learning phase which is not well appropriate to the task.…”
Section: Detection Of Road Cracksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the crack, inside a known texture). (Bray et al, 2006;Chou et al, 1995;Kaseko and Ritchie, 1993;Ritchie et al, 1991) MULTI-SCALE (1990-2009) (Chambon et al, 2009;Delagnes and Barba, 1995;Fukuhara et al, 1990;Subirats et al, 2006;Zhou et al, 2005) …”
Section: Detection Of Road Cracksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the outset these ANN applications have been used as support tools for management decision-making as they complement the already existing rule-based expert systems. Sundin and Braban-Ledoux [10] identify three principal areas for the application of neural networks to PMS: the first area involves estimating the current pavement condition [11,12,13], the second, predicting the future pavement condition [14] and the third, assessing the pavement needs and selecting the best maintenance actions [15,16]. In the estimation of current and also the prediction of future pavement condition, the neural network utilizes as inputs the different pavement characteristics and as targets, the pavement performance indicators such as ride quality or surface distress.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%