2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.01.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A neural network-based input shaping for swing suppression of an overhead crane under payload hoisting and mass variations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also proposed zero vibration derivative (ZVD) shaper, zero vibration derivative-derivative-derivative (ZVDDD) shaper, and specifiedinsensitivity (SI) shaper for cranes. [20][21][22] In recent years, Ramli et al 23 proposed an input shaping control method based on neural network for the problem of the change of the load quality during the lifting process, and successfully applied it to the overhead crane. Meanwhile, to solve external disturbance, such as wind disturbance, Abdullahi et al 24 combined an adaptive controller and a command shaper for sway controls of a three-dimensional (3D) overhead crane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also proposed zero vibration derivative (ZVD) shaper, zero vibration derivative-derivative-derivative (ZVDDD) shaper, and specifiedinsensitivity (SI) shaper for cranes. [20][21][22] In recent years, Ramli et al 23 proposed an input shaping control method based on neural network for the problem of the change of the load quality during the lifting process, and successfully applied it to the overhead crane. Meanwhile, to solve external disturbance, such as wind disturbance, Abdullahi et al 24 combined an adaptive controller and a command shaper for sway controls of a three-dimensional (3D) overhead crane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, according to the crane model, the control methods for crane systems are divided into two main categories. One is linear control methods based on linearization model, including input shaping [1][2][3], trajectory planning [4][5][6], PID control [7][8][9], internal model control [10], etc. In order to reduce the complexity of controller design or stability analysis, these control methods first linearize the complex nonlinear model near the equilibrium point or ignore some specific nonlinear coupling terms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated that the dynamic behavior of the beam is affected by many parameters, such as the mass of the moving load [15], the load's acceleration [16,17], the load's speed [5,18], and many others. Extensive research has been done on the methods and efforts of limiting undesirable payload swing, such as an energy-based control scheme [19], input shaping technology [20], nonlinear coordination control [21], neural network control [22], fuzzy control [23], a trajectory planning method [24], and so forth. However, all these methods focus on how to reduce the swing of the payload and do not take into account the influence of the cable's flexible or the vibrations of the crane's beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%