2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.05.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A neural index of inefficient evidence accumulation in dyslexia underlying slow perceptual decision making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the EEG analysis was exploratory, the results are consistent with an earlier study of typically developing children ( Manning et al, 2021a ) and follow our hypothesised pattern ( https://osf.io/enkwm ). Similarly, Stefanac et al (2021 ) reported reduced centro-parietal build-up in children with dyslexia compared to chronological and reading age-matched controls. Yet, in our direction integration task, we found no compelling evidence for reduced centro-parietal build-up in children with dyslexia and the evidence for a relationship between this EEG measure and drift-rate was weaker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…While the EEG analysis was exploratory, the results are consistent with an earlier study of typically developing children ( Manning et al, 2021a ) and follow our hypothesised pattern ( https://osf.io/enkwm ). Similarly, Stefanac et al (2021 ) reported reduced centro-parietal build-up in children with dyslexia compared to chronological and reading age-matched controls. Yet, in our direction integration task, we found no compelling evidence for reduced centro-parietal build-up in children with dyslexia and the evidence for a relationship between this EEG measure and drift-rate was weaker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Mean alpha power was extracted bilaterally at peak electrodes - PO3/PO7 (left hemisphere) and PO4/PO8 (right hemisphere) - from 400 to 0 ms prior to the target onset and was baseline-corrected using the period of 700 to 400 ms before the target onset (Brosnan et al, 2020). For N2c components, peak negative amplitude was measured contralateral to the target hemifield, from electrodes P7 and P8 between 150 ms and 400 ms post target onset (Stefanac et al, 2021). CPP was extracted from the average of the potentials recorded at the peak electrodes - Pz and POz - and CNV was measured at FCz.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional neural metrics of build-up rate and peak amplitude were calculated using the response-locked CPP waveform. We first fitted a straight line to each participant's waveform [18][19][20]43 and defined the CPP build-up rate as the slope within a -150 to -50 ms window around the response 18,20,58 . Finally, CPP amplitude was defined as the mean amplitude of the response-locked waveform from -25 to 25ms post-response 20,42,59 .…”
Section: Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%