2018
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2018.2829086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Network Tomography Approach for Traffic Monitoring in Smart Cities

Abstract: Various urban planning and managing activities required by a Smart City are feasible because of traffic monitoring. As such, this project proposes a network tomography-based approach that can be applied to road networks to achieve a cost-efficient, flexible, and scalable monitor deployment. Due to the algebraic approach of network tomography, the selection of monitoring intersections can be solved through the use of matrices, with its rows representing paths between two intersections, and its columns represent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A set of sub-optimal solutions for generic network topology were proposed in [43,45]. Maximum Node-identifiability Monitor Placement (MNMP) is a greedy heuristic that gradually adds and removes monitors to the monitor set M to find the optimum combination that maximises the network identifiability and achieve k. Recent work has proposed extensions to this algorithm [9,44,73], some of which are specific for certain types of topologies [9] or application scenarios [73]. However, none of these approaches are suitable for WSN since they do not consider variations in network topology, which impacts the measurement paths used by the probes, and the importance of constantly adjusting the monitor set to maintain the system's reliability over time.…”
Section: Monitor Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set of sub-optimal solutions for generic network topology were proposed in [43,45]. Maximum Node-identifiability Monitor Placement (MNMP) is a greedy heuristic that gradually adds and removes monitors to the monitor set M to find the optimum combination that maximises the network identifiability and achieve k. Recent work has proposed extensions to this algorithm [9,44,73], some of which are specific for certain types of topologies [9] or application scenarios [73]. However, none of these approaches are suitable for WSN since they do not consider variations in network topology, which impacts the measurement paths used by the probes, and the importance of constantly adjusting the monitor set to maintain the system's reliability over time.…”
Section: Monitor Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ma et al [5] proposed a novel monitor placement algorithm for the failed node localisation problem. This placement algorithm approach has featured heavily in the literature in recent years, with further works extending the original algorithm to account for changes to network tomography [6], proposing an algorithm designed for inferring city road traffic [7], and relaxing assumptions about network reliability and taking a topological approach to algorithm design [8].…”
Section: Monitor Placement and The Failed Node Localisation Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, [31] provided an overview of the theoretical problems of video surveillance application, and some feasible approaches. Reference [32] proposed an approach for traffic monitoring that does not rely on probe vehicles, and do not require vehicle localization through GPS. An architecture for smart health monitoring system was proposed and implemented by creating a basic test-bed [33].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%