2016
DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2016.1187246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A network theory-based analysis of stakeholder issues and their interrelationships in large construction projects: a case study

Abstract: Large construction projects are characterized by numerous stakeholders and conflicting interests involved. Previous stakeholder management studies placed great emphasis on stakeholder identification and analysis based on individual stakeholder attributes, which are confined in completeness without taking into account stakeholder-related issues and their interrelationships. In real situations, a project environment is a network of interconnected stakeholder issues, where stakeholder perception and salience are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the evaluation results of degree and network reachability, we divided the nodes in the network into strong and weak actors. The stronger node with higher degree indicates it can better collect information from its neighbors in the network to cope with risks (Castillo et al, 2018;Li et al, 2020), while the stronger node with higher network reachability indicates it can better capture information available in the global network (Mok et al, 2017;Sytch and Tatarynowicz, 2014). Three collaboration strategies are designed to connect relevant actors in the network, i.e.…”
Section: ;mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the evaluation results of degree and network reachability, we divided the nodes in the network into strong and weak actors. The stronger node with higher degree indicates it can better collect information from its neighbors in the network to cope with risks (Castillo et al, 2018;Li et al, 2020), while the stronger node with higher network reachability indicates it can better capture information available in the global network (Mok et al, 2017;Sytch and Tatarynowicz, 2014). Three collaboration strategies are designed to connect relevant actors in the network, i.e.…”
Section: ;mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, the degree index reflects only the local influence of a stakeholder on its adjacent partners and therefore shows limited effectiveness in risk prevention. In contrast, the network reachability of a node reveals how the stakeholder is embedded in the network structure (Mok et al, 2017;Sytch and Tatarynowicz, 2014). High network reachability means that risk-related information can be distributed effectively and rapidly among stakeholders throughout the whole network (Lee et al, 2018;Freeman, 1979).…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As Freeman's (1984) stakeholder theory holds, stakeholder satisfaction management is useful for solving corporate social-related issues effectively and generating good business performance (Porter and Kramer, 2006). In many cases, the perception of success for complex projects has little to do with whether they are completed on time, at cost, and with the desired quality, but the achievement of the desired objectives of different stakeholders (Turner and Zolin, 2012;El-Sawalhi and Salah, 2015;Ujene and Edike, 2015;Mok, Shen and Yang, 2017). Many accept participant satisfaction as a new dimension of project success (e.g.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the 'iron triangle' measures of cost, schedule, and quality, satisfaction has been recognized as another effective measure of project performance (Ibbs and Ashley, 1987;Toor and Ogunlana, 2010;Li, Ng and Skitmore, 2013;Ha et al, 2017). Studies of construction project participant satisfaction have become increasingly prominent over the past decade, with a positive change in focus from individual performance to a greater emphasis on stakeholder interests (Toor and Ogunlana, 2010;Hosseini, Chileshe and Zillante, 2014;Ibiyemi et al, 2014;El-Sawalhi and Salah, 2015;Forsythe, 2015;Ujene and Edike, 2015;Andriof et al, 2017;Mok, Shen and Yang, 2017;Xio, Liu and Pang, 2019). Additionally, project participant satisfaction provides an early sign of the likely outputs in executing complex projects (Williams et al, 2012;Xiong et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%