1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-2172-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Network Orange

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, sums are over all integers, positive, negative, and zero, excluding the single point where all are zero. They are summed numerically using Ewald's method [23,30,31]. A few specific values needed for calculations: Z 3 (2; 1, 1, 1) = 16.5323159598, (B5) Z 3b (2; 1, 1, 1) = −3.8631638072, (B6) Z 3c (2; 1, 1, 1) = −1.8973804658, (B7)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, sums are over all integers, positive, negative, and zero, excluding the single point where all are zero. They are summed numerically using Ewald's method [23,30,31]. A few specific values needed for calculations: Z 3 (2; 1, 1, 1) = 16.5323159598, (B5) Z 3b (2; 1, 1, 1) = −3.8631638072, (B6) Z 3c (2; 1, 1, 1) = −1.8973804658, (B7)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a Coulomb potential) within the N-dimensional crystal [33], but computations are quite involved and results presented were only up to three dimensions. For the N-dimensional case one can explore expansions known for example for the Epstein zeta function [15,34,35] or similar techniques [36]. In this work, we introduce a general formula for the N-dimensional Madelung constant for a simple cubic crystal in terms of a fast convergent Bessel function expansion allowing for analytical continuation, which gives deep insight into the functional behaviour of the N-dimensional Madelung constant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, corresponding to the best-fit value of η = 0.036). In principle, the value of η can be calculated on the basis of the present model (by also including the repulsion between the layers due to exchange interaction), but, while its introduction results in a better fit to the data, it is methodologically wrong to try to model the macroscopic interaction inside the microscopic Hamiltonian (6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%