2020
DOI: 10.5465/amr.2016.0472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Network Conceptualization of Team Conflict

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, multiplex friendship and conflict ties are found to affect team performance differently than uniplex conflict ties (Hood, Cruz, & Bachrach, 2017). Furthermore, recent theorizing suggests that the effect of conflict ties will be mitigated to the extent that they do not overlap with workflow ties and that examining how workflow multiplexity affects conflict relationships within teams is a fruitful research avenue (Park, Mathieu, & Grosser, 2020). Finally, researchers should investigate how ambivalent relationships (e.g., positive and negative affect) are likely to occur in organizations (Methot, Melwani, & Rothman, 2017).…”
Section: Advancing Work Teams Research With Network Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, multiplex friendship and conflict ties are found to affect team performance differently than uniplex conflict ties (Hood, Cruz, & Bachrach, 2017). Furthermore, recent theorizing suggests that the effect of conflict ties will be mitigated to the extent that they do not overlap with workflow ties and that examining how workflow multiplexity affects conflict relationships within teams is a fruitful research avenue (Park, Mathieu, & Grosser, 2020). Finally, researchers should investigate how ambivalent relationships (e.g., positive and negative affect) are likely to occur in organizations (Methot, Melwani, & Rothman, 2017).…”
Section: Advancing Work Teams Research With Network Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, lower task interdependence may limit work contacts between members (cf. Park, Mathieu, & Grosser, 2020; Wageman, 1995), potentially impeding the relevance of emotion suppression and/or relationship conflict for interpersonal perceptions (although we note that controlling for dyadic interaction frequency did not alter our findings in Study 2). By further examining this notion, research may contribute to a more nuanced understanding of how different types of interdependence within work teams may alter the role of members' emotion suppression and other forms of emotion regulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Thus, the study challenges Appelbaum's teacher guide that describes confrontational parent behaviors and lists handling strategies. Since the key for confrontational situations at schools may be in the idiosyncratic interpretations of the counterparts (Egan, 1976;Park, Mathieu, & Grosser, 2020), practical teacher guides that describe confrontational parent behaviors are unlikely to be effective for teachers. Rather, teachers might benefit from the guides that stress the complex nature of interpersonal relations and interpersonal skills of teachers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zembat, 2012) studies investigating confrontation in schools exist in the literature. Park et al (2020), studying team members' conflict in organizations, suggested that interpersonal conflicts are complex and aggregated statistical indices (i.e., variance, mean) fail to indicate the complexity of the concept rigorously. Supporting the idea, the large spectrum of teachers' perceptions on confrontation points out the necessity of qualitative approaches investigating confrontation in schools to honor the complexity of the perceptions and the interpersonal relations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%