2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A naturally derived, cytocompatible, and architecturally optimized scaffold for tendon and ligament regeneration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
93
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
93
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, they can be divided into three major groups including biological (natural), synthetic and hybrid materials 12,41,42 . Biological materials such as collagen, elastin, gelatin, chitosan, albumin, alginate, fibrin and chondroitin sulphate have been shown to be effective in tendon healing 36,40,43,44 . Actually, these materials are biocompatible and biodegradable…”
Section: Basic Materials Of the Scaffoldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Generally, they can be divided into three major groups including biological (natural), synthetic and hybrid materials 12,41,42 . Biological materials such as collagen, elastin, gelatin, chitosan, albumin, alginate, fibrin and chondroitin sulphate have been shown to be effective in tendon healing 36,40,43,44 . Actually, these materials are biocompatible and biodegradable…”
Section: Basic Materials Of the Scaffoldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there are several factors that have an impact on the effectiveness of the scaffold in this regard including the molecule(s) from which the scaffold is manufactured (basic material of the scaffold), architecture of the scaffold, diameter and orientation of the fibres, their biological characteristics and the amount of free spaces and pore size 5,16 . There are also a numbers of other issues that should be considered in manufacturing a scaffold 12 ; for example, a suitable scaffold for tendon tissue engineering should be cytocompatible in vitro and biocompatible and biodegradable in vivo 5,16,33,36,37 . Unfortunately, most of the exogenousbased biomaterials for tendon repair have serious limitations, such as lower capacity for inducing cell proliferation and differentiation (tenoinductivity), poor biocompatibility and remodelling potentials (tenoconductivity) 16,33,38 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[16][17][18][19][20] There is convincing evidence that hostmediated degradation of ECM scaffolds is typically completed within 8-12 weeks and is necessary to realize the full beneficial effects of ECM-mediated tissue remodeling, [21][22][23] but the mechanisms by which such scaffold degradation occurs have been largely ignored.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%