1983
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1983.04390010091012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Naturalistic Assessment of the Motor Activity of Hyperactive Boys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

13
116
2

Year Published

1985
1985
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 285 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
13
116
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Motor activity was automatically and continuously recorded for 24 hours per day for 3 to 5 days by methods previously reported (Wehr & Goodwin, 1981;Porrino et al, 1983). Motor activity was measured by an acceleration-sensitive device with a solid-state memory that stores data on the number of movements per unit time over a 64 hour period (Colburn et al, 1976).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motor activity was automatically and continuously recorded for 24 hours per day for 3 to 5 days by methods previously reported (Wehr & Goodwin, 1981;Porrino et al, 1983). Motor activity was measured by an acceleration-sensitive device with a solid-state memory that stores data on the number of movements per unit time over a 64 hour period (Colburn et al, 1976).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a situation-by-situation analysis, hyperactive children were most consistently and significantly more active than the controls during structured school activities [24]. Interestingly, a study conducted in Ontario has revealed that children with ADHD also had mathematical learning and reading disorders [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although actigraph data may be more time consuming to collect compared to questionnaire data, they provide technologically simple, objective activity level data (Eaton et al 1996), in a method that can be used over large periods of time and has been shown to be readily accepted by the majority of young people (Van Coevering et al 2005). Motion sensor data show good discrimination between ADHD and comparison groups (Inoue et al 1998;McGrath et al 2004;Teicher et al 1996), having indicated an activity level that is 25-30% higher in children with ADHD compared to controls (Porrino et al 1983b). Actigraphs can also detect changes in motor activity following drug treatment for ADHD (Porrino et al 1983a), although this can be dependent on circumstances, with situations requiring greater self regulation having the most discriminatory power (Dane et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motion sensor data show good discrimination between ADHD and comparison groups (Inoue et al 1998;McGrath et al 2004;Teicher et al 1996), having indicated an activity level that is 25-30% higher in children with ADHD compared to controls (Porrino et al 1983b). Actigraphs can also detect changes in motor activity following drug treatment for ADHD (Porrino et al 1983a), although this can be dependent on circumstances, with situations requiring greater self regulation having the most discriminatory power (Dane et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%