Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41563-020-0768-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A natural impact-resistant bicontinuous composite nanoparticle coating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
123
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3g-i, the existing of large pores might result from the loss of broken mineral particles. Under high stress, the crystallites xed on the bers were smashed into small irregular particles 20 and exfoliated during polishing, leading to pores. We also observed bers bridging the tips of opened microcracks (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3g-i, the existing of large pores might result from the loss of broken mineral particles. Under high stress, the crystallites xed on the bers were smashed into small irregular particles 20 and exfoliated during polishing, leading to pores. We also observed bers bridging the tips of opened microcracks (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive studies have been performed in the past ten years to uncover the structural optimization strategies and toughening mechanisms of the stomatopod dactyl, generating numerous characterization results, and various intrinsic and extrinsic toughening mechanisms have been derived [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] . To date, these studies already provided innovative inspirations for the manufacture of high-energy absorption and impact-resistant composite materials in industry [22][23][24] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Load-bearing biocomposites are typically structured as arrays of rigid and predominantly elastic reinforcing elements (e.g., biominerals or crystalline biopolymers), which are connected by a more compliant and energy-dissipating matrix material (e.g., proteins or hemicellulose) through submicron length, compositionally graded, and irregularly-shaped interfacial regions [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. The effective dynamic (viscoelastic) modulus of these interfacial regions provides the biocomposites’ diverse mechanical functions, including adsorbing impacts, detaining cracks, and filtering mechanical signals [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]. Identifying the interfacial dynamic modulus of biocomposites is a long-standing objective of biomaterial science research [ 18 ], it is considered the keystone toward understanding the fundamental structure–function relationships in various biocomposite systems [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%