A natural capital accounting framework to communicate the environmental credentials of individual wool-producing businesses

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to demonstrate methods that sustainability-conscious brands can use to include their primary producers in the measurement and reporting of the environment and sustainability performance of their supply chains. It explores three questions: How can farm businesses provide information required in sustainability reporting? What are the challenges and opportunities experienced in preparing and presenting the information? What future research and policy instruments might be needed to resolve these issues. Design/methodology/approach This study identifies and describes methods to provide the farm-level information needed for environmental performance and sustainability reporting frameworks. It demonstrates them by compiling natural capital accounts and environmental performance information for two wool producers in the grassy woodland biome of Eastern Australia; the contrasting history and management of these producers would be expected to result in different environmental performances. Findings The authors demonstrated an approach to NC accounting that is suitable for including primary producers in environmental performance reporting of supply chains and that can communicate whether individual producers are sustaining, improving or degrading their NC. Measurements suitable for informing farm management and for the estimation of supply chain performance can simultaneously produce information useful for aggregation to regional and national assessments. Practical implications The methods used should assist sustainability-conscious supply chains to more accurately assess the environmental performance of their primary producers and to use these assessments in selective sourcing strategies to improve supply chain performance. Empirical measures of environmental performance and natural capital have the potential to enable evaluation of the effectiveness of sustainability accounting frameworks in inducing businesses to reduce their environmental impacts and improve the condition of the natural capital they depend on. Social implications Two significant social implications exist for the inclusion of primary producers in the sustainability and environmental performance reporting of supply chains. Firstly, it presently takes considerable time and expense for producers to prepare this information. Governments and members of the supply chain should acknowledge the value of this information to their organisations and consider sharing some of the cost of its preparation with primary producers. Secondly, the “additionality” requirement commonly present in existing frameworks may perversely exclude already high-performing producers from being recognised. The methods proposed in this paper provide a way to resolve this. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this research is the first to describe detailed methods of collecting data for natural capital accounting and environmental performance reporting for individual farms and the first to compile the information and present it in a manner coherent with the Kering EP&L and the UN SEEA EA. The authors believe that this will make a significant contribution to the development of fair and standardised ways of measuring individual farm performance and the performance of food, beverage and apparel supply chains.

Impact of COVID-19 and innovative ideas for a sustainable fashion supply chain in the future

“…A world-class luxury fashion group, Kering Group and its brands (Gucci, Balenciaga, Bottega Veneta, Alexander McQueen and Kering Eyewear) are used to explain the findings of this study and to illustrate how the 12 innovative ideas for a sustainable fashion supply chain are put into practice. Kering Group is one of the leading international players committed to sustainability, innovation and environmental protection (Bai et al , 2022; Bertrand, 2021; Bull et al , 2022; Kelleci, 2022; Ogilvy e t al ., 2022). Kering Group owns luxury fashion brands including Gucci, Saint Laurent, Bottega Veneta, Balenciaga, Alexander McQueen, Brioni, Boucheron, Pomellato, DoDo, Qeelin and Kering Eyewear.…”

Empirical Analysis of the Carbon Accounting Information Disclosure (CAID) Affecting R&D Investment and Sustainable Development in State-Owned and Non-State-Owned Enterprises

“…By collecting information on the financial status of the chemical industry for empirical research, it was found that the Development Capacity and debt level were both negatively related to the level of CAID; and positively related to the Company Scale [36]. An empirical analysis of the social responsibility reports of listed companies in the heavy pollution industry was conducted, and it was concluded that the Company Scale, Sustainability and Development Capacity are directly related to the level of information disclosure of the company [37].…”

Processes underpinning natural capital account compilation highlight the potential for low-input grazing to mitigate farm carbon emissions while also improving biodiversity outcomes

“…The modelled sequestration rates were used in combination with the ecologist's assessment of whether an EA was regenerating, stable or degrading, to estimate carbon gain (or loss) in each EA. Modelled sequestration rates for a given STM category varied from farm to farm because the FullCAM modelling takes into account localised factors such as rainfall, elevation and the productive potential for tree growth in that locale (details of the method including FullCAM parameters are described in Ogilvy et al (2022).…”