A national survey of Canadian emergency medicine residents’ comfort with geriatric emergency medicine

Abstract

Background: Geriatric patients represent a large and complex subgroup seen in emergency departments (EDs). Competencies in geriatric emergency medicine (EM) training have been established. Our objectives were to examine Canadian postgraduate year (PGY)-5 EM residents' comfort with the geriatric EM competency domains, assess whether Canadian EM residents become more comfortable through residency, and determine whether geriatric educational exposures are correlated with resident comfort with geriatric EM. Methods: A national, cross-sectional study of PGY-1 and PGY-5 Royal College EM residents was conducted to determine their comfort in geriatric EM clinical competency domains. Residents reported their level of comfort in satisfying each competency domain using a seven-point Likert scale. Residents were also asked about the location of their medical education as well as the type and number of different geriatric exposures that they had received to date. Results: Of the 141 eligible residents from across Canada, 77% (109) consented to participate. None of the PGY-1 EM residents and 34% (14) of PGY-5 EM residents reported that they were comfortable with all eight geriatric EM competency domains. PGY-5 EM residents were significantly more comfortable than PGY-1 EM residents. Residents reported a highly variable range of geriatric educational exposures obtained during training. No relationship was found between resident-reported comfort and the nature or number of geriatric exposures that they had received. Conclusion: Current Royal College EM residency training in Canada may not be adequately preparing graduates to be comfortable with defined competencies for the care of older ED patients.

Effectiveness of interventions to alleviate emergency department crowding by older adults: a systematic review

“…This finding is in line with previous studies addressing the value of putting geriatricians at the “front door” of the hospital; it allows early specialist review, reduces the undertaking of multiple similar patient assessments by medical staff and improves the timeliness and appropriateness of ED disposition decisions [48]. Literature shows that many ED physicians and nurses are not well-trained in geriatric emergency medicine and feel less comfortable when dealing with older adults [49, 50]. Consequently, the management of older adults in the ED often requires more time and resources compared to younger adults [51].…”

Accuracy of Dementia Screening Instruments in Emergency Medicine: A Diagnostic Meta‐analysis

“…Understanding the diagnostic accuracy of ultrabrief dementia screening instruments is also relevant for medical educators. Approximately one‐third of senior emergency medicine residents lack confidence in the recognition and management of cognitive disorders, despite the emphasis on assessing for dementia and delirium as a core competency by the American Board of Emergency Medicine in 2010 . Evidence‐based educators should emphasize that not all dementia screening instruments are equally accurate—and that none of them is diagnostic to rule in dementia.…”

Geriatric Education Programs for Emergency Department Professionals: A Systematic Review

“…However, ED professionals have historically not had specific training or been provided with guidelines for the care of frail older people . Several studies have reported that ED professionals feel unconfident in dealing with complex older patients, which may be related to the underrepresentation of older patient care issues in the medical and nursing curricula . Surveys by the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) found that practicing EPs considered it more difficult to manage older adults compared to younger counterparts and that the time spent during residency training on geriatric emergency medicine (GEM) was inadequate .…”