A National Study on Transportation Affordability of HUD Housing Assistance Programs

Abstract

This national study is an effort to measure transportation costs and affordability for the major Housing and Urban Development (HUD) housing assistance programs since the transportation costs are the second largest expense of American households. This study estimates transportation costs for 76,000 address level properties from seven major HUD-designated affordable housing programs. Our transportation cost models are tailored for low-income households and account for built environmental determinants of travel, known as D variables, at the disaggregated level. We found that more than 44% of these properties in 326 U.S. metropolitan areas are unaffordable in terms of transportation costs. That could result in a waste of over $37.9 billion HUD spends annually to run these programs and subsidize housing for low-income families while some of these families spend substantial amount of their income on transportation. Our findings suggest that the provision of subsidized housing in mixed use, and transit-served neighborhoods would help low-income households to reduce their transportation costs even in auto-oriented sprawling regions. This study concludes with policy recommendations to local and federal governments and transit agencies on ways to incorporate transportation parameters to ensure true affordability for low-income residents of subsidized housing.

Accessibility and Affordability Impacts of Half Price Public Transport Fares in Aotearoa New Zealand

“…We know that public housing residents, including those in our study experience transport difficulties related to affordability and accessibility (Fitt et al 2022;Jahan and Hamidi 2020;Thompson 2022), with lowest income households spending more than a quarter of their income on transport (StatsNZ 2019) Our hypothesis is that reduced cost public transport can play an important role in affordability and accessibility, specifically for those on lower incomes who face transport difficulty.…”

Evaluation of Energy Systems Network's Moving Forward Initiative in Indiana: Initial Program Outcomes and Potential Impacts

“…There are a growing number of examples of efforts to seize on the benefits of energy efficiency (EE) or renewable energy (RE) to reduce out-of-pocket expenses for low-income families and resources to support the increased uptake of EE and RE in affordable housing (Schwartz et al, 2018;EPA, 2018). The potential to ease the overall financial burden on low-income families by lowering transportation costs has also been recognized (DOT, 2015;Jahan and Hamidi, 2020). However, as discussed further below, there is an absence of prominent examples of policies or programs that attempt to tackle both energy and transportation affordability.…”