2001
DOI: 10.1162/152651601317139531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A National Study of Ethics Committees

Abstract: Conceived as a solution to clinical dilemmas, and now required by organizations for hospital accreditation, ethics committees have been subject only to small-scale studies. The wide use of ethics committees and the diverse roles they have played compel study. In 1999 the University of Pennsylvania Ethics Committee Research Group (ECRG) completed the first national survey of the presence, composition, and activities of U.S. healthcare ethics committees (HECs). Ethics committees are relatively young, on average … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
45
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies of ethics support services have sought to establish aspects such as: the prevalence of support services, their type, structure, composition, main functions, activities and processes (see for example McGee et al, 2001;Slowther et al, , 2004Slowther, McClimans, and Price, 2012;Godkin et al, 2005;Milmore, 2006;Fox, Myers, and Pearlman, 2007;Frewer and Fahr, 2007;Swetz et al, 2007;Pedersen, Akre, and Førde, 2009;Romano et al, 2009;Whitehead et al, 2009;Kesselheim, Johnson, and Joffe, 2010;Gaudine et al, 2010;Nelson et al, 2010b;Tapper et al, 2010;Moeller et al, 2012). What these studies mostly show is the diversity of CES services.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Ces Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies of ethics support services have sought to establish aspects such as: the prevalence of support services, their type, structure, composition, main functions, activities and processes (see for example McGee et al, 2001;Slowther et al, , 2004Slowther, McClimans, and Price, 2012;Godkin et al, 2005;Milmore, 2006;Fox, Myers, and Pearlman, 2007;Frewer and Fahr, 2007;Swetz et al, 2007;Pedersen, Akre, and Førde, 2009;Romano et al, 2009;Whitehead et al, 2009;Kesselheim, Johnson, and Joffe, 2010;Gaudine et al, 2010;Nelson et al, 2010b;Tapper et al, 2010;Moeller et al, 2012). What these studies mostly show is the diversity of CES services.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Ces Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kliniske etikkomiteer er en etablert tjeneste for etikkstøtte i helsetjenesten internasjonalt (McGee et al 2001;Slowther, Hope, Ashcroft 2001). Stortinget besluttet i 2000 at alle helseforetak skal ha en klinisk etikkomite (Førde & Thorleifsson 2003).…”
Section: Bakgrunnunclassified
“…Even in the USA this is not clear. 15 Since ethics concerns what we do (everything we do), there is a potential for a group of like-minded enthusiasts to pronounce on an enormous range of areas in which they have no special expertise. The competencies needed to serve on such a committee remain undefined; the role of the lay member, in contrast to those in research ethics committees, is not clear, especially if individual case problems are referred; nor is the position of CECs in clinical governance and the quality agenda agreed.…”
Section: What Should Be the Role Of Cecs?mentioning
confidence: 99%