2017
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A national quitline service and its promotion in the mass media: modelling the health gain, health equity and cost–utility

Abstract: The package of a quitline service and its promotion in the mass media appears to be an effective means to generate health gain, address health inequalities and save health system costs. Nevertheless, the role of this intervention needs to be compared with other tobacco control and health sector interventions, some of which may be even more cost saving.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In modelling health gain and net health system costs we used a well-established Markov macro-simulation model utilizing a multi-state life-table approach: the "BODE 3 Tobacco Model" including probabilistic uncertainty about multiple input parameters [12,[19][20][21][22][23]. This model includes 16 tobacco-related diseases using national data by sex, age and ethnicity for the whole New Zealand population in 2011.…”
Section: Modelling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In modelling health gain and net health system costs we used a well-established Markov macro-simulation model utilizing a multi-state life-table approach: the "BODE 3 Tobacco Model" including probabilistic uncertainty about multiple input parameters [12,[19][20][21][22][23]. This model includes 16 tobacco-related diseases using national data by sex, age and ethnicity for the whole New Zealand population in 2011.…”
Section: Modelling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Promotion of smoking cessation using mass media campaigns (and more targeted advertising) has been found to be a cost-effective investment in tobacco control [10,11]. In New Zealand (NZ), such mass media campaigns have also been reported to be cost-effective when promoting the national quitline service [12]. This suggested to us the possible value of promotion of smoking apps as an additional intervention for those smokers not using the quitline.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given these issues, additional RCTs are desirable, especially those measuring quitting out to 12 months and actual costs of recruitment that might likely occur in population roll out. Furthermore, policy-makers need to compare app promotion with other potential tobacco control interventions eg, as per the published league table of tobacco control studies using the BODE 3 Tobacco Model" in Nghiem et al [11] and online [26]. Some of these major interventions (eg, further tax increases, a tobacco-free generation and a sinking lid on supply) would be likely to generate much greater health gain (although they are also typically applied for greater than this five-year intervention, indeed lifelong), as well as accelerating progress to tobacco endgame goals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In modeling health gain and net health system costs we used a well-established Markov macrosimulation model utilizing a multi-state life-table approach: the "BODE 3 Tobacco Model" including probabilistic uncertainty about multiple input parameters [11,[17][18][19][20][21]. This model includes 16 tobacco-related diseases using national data by sex, age and ethnicity for the whole New Zealand population in 2011.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation