1972
DOI: 10.3102/00028312009003373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A National Experiment in Curriculum Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The historical approach recommends incorporating history of science in science teaching as a means to promote among learners more informed views of the scientific endeavour (e.g., Klopfer & Watson, 1957;Rutherford, Holton, & Watson, 1970). Evidence concerning the effectiveness of the historical approach (Klopfer & Cooley, 1963 ;Solomon, Duveen, Scot, & McCarthy, 1992;Welch & Walberg, 1972;Yager & Wick, 1966) is, at best, inconclusive. Thus, simply engaging students in inquiry-based activities or providing historical examples of scientific developments has been shown not to be consistently successful in promoting learners' conceptions of NOS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The historical approach recommends incorporating history of science in science teaching as a means to promote among learners more informed views of the scientific endeavour (e.g., Klopfer & Watson, 1957;Rutherford, Holton, & Watson, 1970). Evidence concerning the effectiveness of the historical approach (Klopfer & Cooley, 1963 ;Solomon, Duveen, Scot, & McCarthy, 1992;Welch & Walberg, 1972;Yager & Wick, 1966) is, at best, inconclusive. Thus, simply engaging students in inquiry-based activities or providing historical examples of scientific developments has been shown not to be consistently successful in promoting learners' conceptions of NOS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Based on the success of incorporating classroom environment measures into evaluations of Harvard Project Physics (Welch and Walberg 1972) and computerassisted learning (Teh and Fraser 1994), it is suggested that evaluations in Nigeria include classroom environment dimensions as criteria of effectiveness. Finally, as mentioned previously, it would be desirable to combine qualitative and quantitative methods in future classroom environment research (Fraser and Tobin 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, when classroom environment instruments have been used as a source of process criteria in curriculum evaluation, studies involving the Australian Science Education Project (Fraser 1979a) and Harvard Project Physics (Welch and Walberg 1972) revealed that classroom environment variables differentiated revealingly between alternative curricula when measures of student achievement of cognitive and attitudinal goals have shown little sensitivity.…”
Section: Classroom Environment Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In particular, classroom environment dimensions can provide important process criteria in evaluating educational programs and curricula (Walberg, 1975;Fraser, 1981a). In fact, several studies of alternative educational curricula or programs have shown that classroom environment variables have differentiated revealingly among programs, often wheh various cognitive outcome measures have shown little sensitivity (Anderson, Walberg and Welch, 1969;Welch and Walberg, 1972;Eash and Talmage, 1975;Cort, 1979;Levin, 1980). The LEI has been used in a variety of other studies which have sought to identify factors influencing classroom environment.…”
Section: Overseas Work On Development and Use Of Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 97%