A National Early Intervention System as a Strategy to Promote Inclusion and Academic Achievement in Portugal

Abstract

Early intervention with children at risk or facing developmental problems is a practice defined by three fundamental characteristics: being family-centered, being based on the community and on the child’s life context, and being conducted by a team with transdisciplinary practice. In this paper we wish to present how the SNIPI-National System of Early Intervention, implemented in Portugal over the past 15 years, contributes to promote maximum development and the full inclusion of children up to 6 years of age and works to prevent school failure. The SNIPI covers the entire territory and intends to respond to the needs of children with developmental disorders or those in at risk situations. This community-based early intervention model is linked to the health, education and social care systems, involving the three responsible Ministries. In the present community case study, we present the implementation of this program in the Alentejo region, involving 31 local teams and almost 2500 children. Through the regional structure’s reports and the responses of parents and professionals in impact studies, we demonstrate how the system is established and how it tackles school failure and improves the educational inclusion of these children. The impact of this Early Intervention model has been significant not only on children’s developmental outcomes, but also for the health, education and social care professionals who work in a transdisciplinary perspective, as well as for the families who became more skilled at evaluating the children’s needs and the support provided. This approach to implementing a family-centered Early Intervention program can contribute to full inclusion. It facilitates the transition to schooling based on a non-discriminatory approach and educational achievement by aiding development and an adapted contextualization in pre-school education. This program system introduces significant innovation within the framework of existing educational policies that promote development and inclusion, and has therefore earned the interest of the scientific community and policy-makers alike. It has been possible to implement some of principles already studied but it had never been tested. The Early Intervention program in Alentejo, as part of the SNIPI, can be an example of good practices, with its own characteristics that allowed to create a network of integrated and comprehensive responses to the needs of the population in this region.

Comparison Between Performance Levels for Mathematical Competence: Results for the Sex Variable

“…Schools must develop educational practices that allow inclusive, quality education for all (Franco et al, 2017;Arnaiz-Sánchez et al, 2018, 2020. Educational administrations must ensure all students achieve functional and meaningful learning, making it a priority to support the existence of equitable, democratic schooling adjusted to each student's needs and characteristics.…”

The Implications of Filial Piety in Study Engagement and Study Satisfaction: A Polish-Vietnamese Comparison

“…In psychological literature describes many determining variables related with school failure and academic achievement or satisfaction, e.g.,: the influence of self-control and grit on academic self-efficacy and satisfaction with school ( Oriol et al, 2017 ); the links between career preparedness and academic development ( Oliveira et al, 2017 ); the relationship between emotion understanding and school achievement ( Franco et al, 2017 ); the association between variables of individual and school-related well-being and those of school achievement and performance ( López et al, 2017 ); and the influence of family socio-economic status and parental support on success at school ( Pires et al, 2017 ). Although many relationships between different variables and school problems have already been established, few studies have investigated the universal (i.e., etic) psychological mechanism underlying parent–child relations, which could be applicable in any culture.…”

Schools That Promote the Improvement of Academic Performance and the Success of All Students

“…Contextual variables have also been highlighted as important predictive factors in academic performance (Jeynes, 2010;Zuffianò et al, 2013). Notable among them is the orientation to learning goals (Hsieh et al, 2007), learning strategies (Preckel and Brunner, 2015;Veas et al, 2017), popularity (Schwartz et al, 2006), adaptation to the school context (McCoach and Siegle, 2003), early attention (Franco et al, 2017), the use of methodologies such as peer mentoring (Durán and Vidal, 2004;Dunn et al, 2017), the participation of families in the school (Wilder, 2014), or the relationships established between students and teachers (Ramberg et al, 2019). Hincapie et al (2018) relate academic performance to teaching methodology.…”