1988
DOI: 10.2307/968278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Narrow Vision: Duncan Campbell Scott and the Administration of Indian Affairs in Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given this possibility, it is worth remembering that this structure has been imposed onto certain Indigenous peoples by Canada and is therefore legitimate only insofar as settler colonial law makes it so (Boldt 1993, 125-26). Scholars have described the Chief and Council system as a dysfunctional form of government created as part of the state's (legal) assimilation of Indigenous nations (Canada, Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1996, 237;Borrows 2017a, 121), one predicated on the disempowerment of all but a few political elites (Boldt 1993, 129) and forced onto Indigenous nations in a constitutional landscape that leaves no room for inherent Indigenous political authority (Monture-Angus 1999, 34;Titley 1986;Pasternak 2017). Specifically, it was designed to replace inherent Indigenous governance systems with municipal-type political bodies (Canada, Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1996, 132, 253), the adoption of which settler colonial bureaucrats considered "a mark of progress and civilization" (Daugherty and Madill 1980, 2).…”
Section: Indigenous Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this possibility, it is worth remembering that this structure has been imposed onto certain Indigenous peoples by Canada and is therefore legitimate only insofar as settler colonial law makes it so (Boldt 1993, 125-26). Scholars have described the Chief and Council system as a dysfunctional form of government created as part of the state's (legal) assimilation of Indigenous nations (Canada, Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1996, 237;Borrows 2017a, 121), one predicated on the disempowerment of all but a few political elites (Boldt 1993, 129) and forced onto Indigenous nations in a constitutional landscape that leaves no room for inherent Indigenous political authority (Monture-Angus 1999, 34;Titley 1986;Pasternak 2017). Specifically, it was designed to replace inherent Indigenous governance systems with municipal-type political bodies (Canada, Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1996, 132, 253), the adoption of which settler colonial bureaucrats considered "a mark of progress and civilization" (Daugherty and Madill 1980, 2).…”
Section: Indigenous Governancementioning
confidence: 99%