A Narrative Policy Framework: Clear Enough to Be Wrong?

Abstract

Narratives are increasingly subject to empirical study in a wide variety of disciplines. However, in public policy, narratives are thought of almost exclusively as a poststructural concept outside the realm of empirical study. In this paper, after reviewing the major literature on narratives, we argue that policy narratives can be studied using systematic empirical approaches and introduce a "Narrative Policy Framework" (NPF) for elaboration and empirical testing. The NPF defines narrative structure and narrative content. We then discuss narrative at the micro level of analysis and examine how narratives impact individual attitudes and hence aggregate public opinion. Similarly, we examine strategies for the studying of group and elite behavior using the NPF. We conclude with seven hypotheses for researchers interested in elaborating the framework.

The Tragedy of the Risk-Perception Commons: Culture Conflict, Rationality Conflict, and Climate Change

“…There are also many hierarchical and individualistic people who believe in the need to take action, of one form or another, to address climate change risks, and who can be counted on to make the case for doing so in terms that appeal to rather than alienate members of the public who share their outlooks (Kahan 2010). The cultural richness of the full range of potential policy responses and available advocates are narrative resources for opening minds (Jones & McBeth 2010;Verwij et al 2006). It would be irrational for actors committed to disseminating sound scientific information not to make use of them.…”

Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus

“…The elements of these narrative templates-the identity of the stock heroes and villains, the nature of their dramatic struggles, and the moral stakes of their engagement with one another-vary in identifiable and recurring ways across cultural groups. By crafting messages to evoke narrative templates that are culturally congenial to target audiences, risk communicators can help to assure that the content of the information they are imparting receives considered attention across diverse cultural groups (Earle & Cvetckovich 1995;Jones & McBeth 2010).…”

Building a dangerous outpost in the Green Mountain State: A case study of educator preparation policymaking

“…After analyzing the data using the more inductive approach of lifestory, we then examined the case through the lens of The Narrative Policy Framework (NPF; Jones & McBeth, 2010;McBeth, Jones, & Shanahan, 2014;Shanahan, Jones, & McBeth, 2011). The goal of NPF is to examine how policy narratives shape policy outcomes (Ertas, 2015).…”