2006
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/23/010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A nanodosimetry-based linear-quadratic model of cell survival for mixed-LET radiations

Abstract: A new nanodosimetry-based linear-quadratic (LQ) model of cell survival for mixed-LET radiations has been developed. The new model employs three physical quantities and three biological quantities. The three physical quantities are related to energy depositions at two nanometre scales, 5 nm and 25 nm. The three biological quantities are related to the lesion production and interaction probabilities and the lesion repair rate. The coefficients alpha and beta of the LQ formula (alpha D + beta D(2)) are explicitly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cell killing is also important for bacterial decontamination and microbial inactivation [21][22][23][24]. Though cell survival and dose-related killing have been studied in the context of radiation [25,26], electric pulsed survival studies and data are relatively scant. Reported data reveals a threshold effect in cell killing by electric fields, with survival being the eventual outcome if either the field intensities or number of pulses (or both) are not sufficiently high [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell killing is also important for bacterial decontamination and microbial inactivation [21][22][23][24]. Though cell survival and dose-related killing have been studied in the context of radiation [25,26], electric pulsed survival studies and data are relatively scant. Reported data reveals a threshold effect in cell killing by electric fields, with survival being the eventual outcome if either the field intensities or number of pulses (or both) are not sufficiently high [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simple effect additivity S(d), given by Eq. (4), is the most obvious default hypothesis, but is often not the best (20,34,36,55,56). In this work, we compared S(d) with incremental effect additivity I(d) as applied to mixed-beam experiments on murine HG tumorigenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though LQ parameters depend on the cell line, cell-cycle stage, and modalities of radiation delivery, 15,16 it is accepted that various tumors have a ratio ␣ / ␤ of 10 Gy ͑1 Gy=1 Gray= 1 J / Kg͒ or even higher. 17 We assumed ␣ p = 0.1 Gy −1 and ␤ p = 0.01 Gy −2 .…”
Section: Iic Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%