“…In order to fulfill the direct detection of COD, many materials have been tested as electrocatalysts, including CoO [6], Cu [7,8,9,10,11], Ni-Cu [12], TiO 2 [13,14], PbO 2 [15], nano-Pt [16], CuO/AgO [17], Cu-Co [18], nickel nanoparticle/nafion-graphene oxide (GO) [19], boron doped diamond(BDD) [20,21], Ti/Sb–SnO 2 /PbO 2 [22], and carbon fiber felt/CeO 2 -β-PbO 2 [23]. Among them, Cu-base materials have been recognized as promising electrocatalysts for determination of COD in water samples due to their strong ability to electro-oxidize organic compounds [24] and have drawn increasing attention in the past [7,8,9,10,11,12]. For example, Silva et al used a Cu rod electrode as the sensor and found that it exhibited a wide COD linear range (53.0–2801.4 mg/L) but a high detection limit (20.3 mg/L) despite having a good ability to produce active species CuO(OH) [7].…”