Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mutual Learning Platform: A Consumer-supplier Collaboration Experiment for Low-carbon Supply Chain innovation

Abstract: The value chain and corresponding supply chain have been developed depending on an economy that requires high greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This problem needs to be solved and drastic changes are needed. Suppliers have been taking a variety of measures, albeit within the ranges of their present value chains, in response to societal demands and following or pre-empting government requests. Meanwhile, consumers also find behavioural change difficult, even though they are aware of eco-friendly purchasing. We de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the articles on non-formal education, these addressed different societal segments, including the local community in household waste management and natural resource conservation (Hadiyanti, 2016;Indrianti, 2016;Patterson, Lindén, Edward, Wilhelmsson, and Löfgren, 2009); the public and private sectors in environmental bioethics and food consumption (Oto et al, 2012;Ribas et al, 2017;Ruini et al, 2016); health professionals dealing with alcohol consumption issues and healthcare waste management (Brumby et al, 2011;Kumar, Somrongthong, and Shaikh, 2015); household water end-users (Kossieris, Kozanis, et al, 2014;Kossieris, Panayiotakis, et al, 2014); consumers and retailers (Nagata, Azuma, Oda, Fujiwara, and Hanya, 2014); the general public on solid and municipal solid waste management (Kamaruddin, Pawson, and Kingham, 2013;Polanec et al, 2013); and, studies directed to youth from middle school age (Hadjichambis, Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, Ioannou, Georgiou, and Manoli, 2015), to university age (Yang, Chien, and Liu, 2012).…”
Section: Type Of Education and Thematic Focusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the articles on non-formal education, these addressed different societal segments, including the local community in household waste management and natural resource conservation (Hadiyanti, 2016;Indrianti, 2016;Patterson, Lindén, Edward, Wilhelmsson, and Löfgren, 2009); the public and private sectors in environmental bioethics and food consumption (Oto et al, 2012;Ribas et al, 2017;Ruini et al, 2016); health professionals dealing with alcohol consumption issues and healthcare waste management (Brumby et al, 2011;Kumar, Somrongthong, and Shaikh, 2015); household water end-users (Kossieris, Kozanis, et al, 2014;Kossieris, Panayiotakis, et al, 2014); consumers and retailers (Nagata, Azuma, Oda, Fujiwara, and Hanya, 2014); the general public on solid and municipal solid waste management (Kamaruddin, Pawson, and Kingham, 2013;Polanec et al, 2013); and, studies directed to youth from middle school age (Hadjichambis, Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, Ioannou, Georgiou, and Manoli, 2015), to university age (Yang, Chien, and Liu, 2012).…”
Section: Type Of Education and Thematic Focusmentioning
confidence: 99%