1996
DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(96)00133-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mutation in the p53 tumor suppressor gene of AHH-1 tk+− human lymphoblastoid cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AHH-1 is a human lymphoblastoid TK +/− cell line that constitutively expresses a high level of native CYP1A1 ( 18 ). AHH-1 cells carry a heterozygous mutation in the TP53 locus ( 19–21 ). The human lymphoblastoid cell line MCL-5 is derived from AHH-1 by stable transfection with human cytochromes (CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP3A4 and CYP2E1) and microsomal epoxide hydrolase ( 18 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AHH-1 is a human lymphoblastoid TK +/− cell line that constitutively expresses a high level of native CYP1A1 ( 18 ). AHH-1 cells carry a heterozygous mutation in the TP53 locus ( 19–21 ). The human lymphoblastoid cell line MCL-5 is derived from AHH-1 by stable transfection with human cytochromes (CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP3A4 and CYP2E1) and microsomal epoxide hydrolase ( 18 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The human lymphoblastoid AHH-1/TK þ/À and MCL-5 cell lines, which were established by Crespi and Thilly [1984], both originated from AHH-1 cells and both can be used for assaying TK mutation. MCL-5 is a p53 wild-type cell line, while AHH-1 is heterozygous for the p53 gene and expresses both wild-type and mutant (282Trp) p53 protein [Morris et al, 1996]. The spontaneous TK mutant frequency in AHH-1 cells is about 17 Â 10 À6 , which is fivefold higher than that of MCL-5 cells [Dobo et al, 1995].…”
Section: Role Of P53 In Maintaining Genomic Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, a chronic study is likely to involve comparisons between smaller exposures, meaning a reduction effect is more difficult to detect within a dataset of the same size. That hormesis and adaptive responses should be regarded as distinct processes, rather than manifestations of a single process, is also reflected in studies in yeast, where a dose of hydrogen peroxide that induces a clear adaptive response to a subsequent high-dose challenge does not induce hormesis in the original sense of a biphasic curve from single exposures to each dose 37 . Thus, one may see hormetic treatments that do not induce an adaptive response, and one may see an adaptive response with no concomitant hormesis.…”
Section: J-shaped Dose-responses Are Observed Infrequently In Our Labmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Previous publications have also identified the involvement of p53 in genotoxicity dose-responses for TK6 cells [28,31]. It is unclear whether p53 was responsible for Thomas et al's dose-response; unlike TK6 cells, AHH-1 cells are heterozygous for p53 function due to a base pair substitution at codon 282, with consequences including loss of the G1 checkpoint and delayed apoptotic cell death [37]. Indeed, more efficient repair of apurinic/apyrimidic sites by MPG in wild-type p53 cells than mutant p53 cells [38] may explain why a different mechanism may be responsible for Thomas et al's J-shaped dose-response.…”
Section: P53 Status May Contribute To the J-shaped Dose-responsementioning
confidence: 99%